Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people more of their waste? v.3

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. v. 3
Nowadays, concerns about recycling is on the rise. Lots of people argue that government interference is the only way to enforce people recycle more of their waste. However, it is disagreed that the only way to boost recycling depends on the authority's decision about making it an obligation. In my opinion, government interference is one of the most efficient ways possible as well as opening learning centres and making advertisements. Firstly, governments can open learning centres in order to educate its citizens about the benefits of recycling and its process. For example, it is generally agreed that opening an education centre could lead people to put more of their wastes into recycling bins, since they would be aware of the benefits of recycling such as its contribution to energy production and therefore, the country’s economy. Thus, this makes it clear that government interference is not the only approach in terms of encouraging people to recycle more of their trash. Secondly, making advertisements about recycling would be an efficient action to inform people about the disastrous effects of recycling less. For instance, it is widely known that an increasing amount of wastes could cause pollution, which can prevented by just making attractive and informing advertisements. As well as education centres, advertisements can encourage people to put more of their wastes in recycling bins. In addition, it is much more preferable due to its cost effectiveness. Therefore, it becomes apparent that making recycling a legal requirement is not the only action for governments to increase it. To sum up, rather than making recycling a requirement, governments can open education centres and make public advertisements to educate its citizens in order to boost recycling. So, it is clear that there are other ways for governments to increase recycling. Thus, I contradict any idea that suggests making recycling a legal requirement is the only way to increase it.
Nowadays, concerns about
recycling
is on the rise. Lots of
people
argue that
government
interference is the
only
way
to enforce
people
recycle more of their
waste
.
However
, it
is disagreed
that the
only
way
to boost
recycling
depends on the authority's decision about making it an obligation. In my opinion,
government
interference is one of the most efficient
ways
possible
as well
as opening learning
centres
and making advertisements.

Firstly
,
governments
can open learning
centres
in order to educate its citizens about the benefits of
recycling
and its process.
For example
, it is
generally
agreed
that opening an education
centre
could lead
people
to put more of their
wastes
into
recycling
bins, since they would be aware of the benefits of
recycling
such as its contribution to energy production and
therefore
, the country’s economy.
Thus
, this
makes
it
clear
that
government
interference is not the
only
approach in terms of encouraging
people
to recycle more of their trash.

Secondly
, making
advertisements
about
recycling
would be an efficient action to inform
people
about the disastrous effects of
recycling
less.
For instance
, it is
widely
known that an increasing amount of
wastes
could cause pollution, which can
prevented
by
just
making attractive and informing
advertisements
.
As well
as education
centres
,
advertisements
can encourage
people
to put more of their
wastes
in
recycling
bins.
In addition
, it is much more preferable due to its
cost effectiveness
.
Therefore
, it becomes apparent that making
recycling
a legal requirement is not the
only
action for
governments
to increase it.

To sum up,
rather
than making
recycling
a requirement,
governments
can open education
centres
and
make
public
advertisements
to educate its citizens in order to boost
recycling
.
So
, it is
clear
that there are other
ways
for
governments
to increase
recycling
.
Thus
, I contradict any
idea
that suggests making
recycling
a legal requirement is the
only
way
to increase it.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8Mistakes

IELTS essay Some people claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. v. 3

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
314 words
8
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 8.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 8.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 8.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 8.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts