Since tons of rules have come to an act, people' s lifestyle has been bounded by these rules to a great extend. It has been a burning issue that whether lifestyle of people ought to be supervised by government or they himself should let free to decide their fate. Here, i would like to discuss both views with my opinion
It is argued that lifestyle of people should be in government' s hand. Lifestyle without supervision can lead to several problems as people will have independence to do things according to their desires, whether good or bad, they will perform all illegal activities freely, this situation can lead to lots of crime. Furthermore, government has power to regulate people' s lifestyle in better way by bringing some laws in practice. Hence, government should step forward and take care of lifestyle of people for the betterment of their country.
Other' s have conflicting views, according to them, this is era of democracy where people are liable for taking their decision on their own for their bright tomorrow. They believe that, people are educated enough and they know what is better for them. therefore, they should set free to live their lives accordingly as it can be complicated for government to regulate every single one' s lifestyle in big populated countries.
In my notion, everyone should be allocated with rights that they could supervise their lifestyle according to their desires to a certain extend. But, government should also associate in order to eliminate those illegal activities which are taking place on name of lifestyle. To be specific, usage of drugs have been mammoth over the past few years on name of lifestyle. however, such trend ought to be outlawed by government
To recapitulate, there should be a mutual level in determining lifestyle of people. All the legal activities should be taken care by people and government should involve when lifestyle leads to commit any crime
Since tons of
rules
have
come
to an act,
people&
#039; s
lifestyle
has
been bounded
by these
rules
to a great
extend
. It has been a burning issue that whether
lifestyle
of
people
ought to
be supervised
by
government or
they himself should
let
free to decide their fate. Here,
i
would like to discuss both views with my opinion
It
is argued
that
lifestyle
of
people
should be in
government&
#039; s hand.
Lifestyle
without supervision can lead to several problems as
people
will have independence to do things according to their desires, whether
good
or
bad
, they will perform all illegal activities
freely
, this situation can lead to lots of crime.
Furthermore
,
government
has power to regulate
people&
#039; s
lifestyle
in better way by bringing
some
laws in practice.
Hence
,
government
should step forward and take care of
lifestyle
of
people
for the betterment of their country.
Other&
#039; s have conflicting views, according to them, this is era of democracy where
people
are liable for taking their decision on their
own
for their bright tomorrow. They believe that,
people
are educated
enough and
they know what is better for them.
therefore
, they should set free to
live
their
lives
accordingly
as it can
be complicated
for
government
to regulate every single
one&
#039; s
lifestyle
in
big
populated countries.
In my notion, everyone should
be allocated
with rights that they could supervise their
lifestyle
according to their desires to a certain
extend
.
But
,
government
should
also
associate in order to eliminate those illegal activities which are taking place on name of
lifestyle
. To be specific, usage of drugs have been mammoth over the past few years on name of
lifestyle
.
however
, such trend ought to
be outlawed
by
government
To recapitulate, there should be a mutual level in determining
lifestyle
of
people
. All the legal activities should
be taken
care by
people
and
government
should involve when
lifestyle
leads to commit any
crime