In recent years, having healthy lifestyle has been at the center of global debates, and it becomes an arguable question that who has the responsiblity for preparing people' s health, the people themselves or the government? Many attitudes exist towards this issue.
On the one hand, many people note that one of the major responsibilities of the government is to ensure that the members of a society live healthily. This is feasible by preparing for them accommodations and facilities which are dealing with their health. First and foremost is the food which people consume daily such as vegetables, fruits, and dairy products. Therefore, the government should blame the shoulder if these products are spoiled or unhealthy. Secondly, sports clubs, swimming pools, and other sport' s accommodations should be accessible in order to prevent obesity, and other consequences of the passive lifestyle. Last but not least, the government' s major contribution to health is not only in diagnosing and curing the ailments but also in preventing and rehabilitating them. For instance, it is the government duty to invest the public money on preventing the widespread diseases by vaccination. Thus, the government plays a significant role to bring and preserve people' s health.
On the other hand, others claim that considering all actions above, having a healthy lifestyle is an individual term. In fact, neither the government nor anyone else can bring an individual a healthy lifestyle. Meanwhile, people could not live healthy unless they decide to, schedule for and stick to it. Even if a myriad of sports clubs exist, still many may continue their passive lifestyle. Consequently, there is no guarantee for having healthy life unless an individual decides to have.
To sum up, in order to live healthy not only does the government action need, but also the individual decisions are required. Without these factors acquiring health and a healthy lifestyle are not feasible.
In recent years, having
healthy
lifestyle
has been at the center of global debates, and it becomes an arguable question that who has the
responsiblity
for preparing
people&
#039; s
health
, the
people
themselves or the
government
?
Many
attitudes exist towards this issue.
On the one hand,
many
people
note that one of the major responsibilities of the
government
is to ensure that the members of a society
live
healthily
. This is feasible by preparing for them accommodations and facilities which are dealing with their
health
.
First
and foremost is the food which
people
consume daily such as vegetables, fruits, and dairy products.
Therefore
, the
government
should blame the shoulder if these products
are spoiled
or unhealthy.
Secondly
, sports clubs, swimming pools, and
other
sport&
#039; s accommodations should be accessible in order to
prevent
obesity, and
other
consequences of the passive
lifestyle
. Last
but
not least, the
government&
#039; s major contribution to
health
is not
only
in diagnosing and curing the ailments
but
also
in preventing and rehabilitating them.
For instance
, it is the
government
duty to invest the public money on preventing the widespread diseases by vaccination.
Thus
, the
government
plays a significant role to bring and preserve
people&
#039; s health.
On the
other
hand, others claim that considering all actions above, having a
healthy
lifestyle
is an
individual
term. In fact, neither the
government
nor anyone else can bring an
individual
a
healthy
lifestyle
. Meanwhile,
people
could not
live
healthy
unless they decide to, schedule for and stick to it. Even if a myriad of sports clubs exist,
still
many may
continue their passive
lifestyle
.
Consequently
, there is no guarantee for having
healthy
life unless an
individual
decides to have.
To sum up, in order to
live
healthy
not
only
does the
government
action need,
but
also
the
individual
decisions
are required
. Without these factors acquiring
health
and a
healthy
lifestyle
are not feasible.