Currently, many students are worried about entering universities thinking about the election program. Some people believe that the election company should accept only excellent students at their university, I give my vote to that group of people who think that other factors need to be taken into account.
On the one hand, for starters it’s worth noting that Rather than filling spots with well-rounded students, many colleges, particularly selective ones, seek to identify a mix of applicants who show a passion and very deep talent in an area or two, and because of this they accept candidates according to the criteria of an excellent average mark. Although the quality of a leader will help ensure the effectiveness of learning, ideal students have a higher perception of material. For instance, by adhering to the introductory program at the best university in the world - Harvard, exclusively professional students are able to study at this higher education institution. Additionally, No matter how selective the university is, student grades will probably matter most. In put more precisely, Admissions officers place a high value on student's academic transcript as an indicator of how prepared students are for college work. As a result, excellent students will ensure the prosperity of the university.
On the other hand, I agree that the election program should give a chance to those who do not have an ideal average score. Firstly, Admission counselors consider a worthy candidate to be one who looks beyond the bounds of an assessment of evidence of leadership and individual value. In other words, it is important for universities to have students who will make special programs that will improve the effectiveness of training. Even if academic preparedness talks about college preparedness, responsibility and leadership will push the university forward on a rating scale. To illustrate, At Roanoke College, it receives about 5, 500 applications each year and accepts about 72% of the candidates, because it is always looking for the potential and diversity of students. Secondly, Institutional priorities could also include finding students with exceptional talent in art, music or athletics or filling department-specific needs. Such a so-called holistic approach to admissions can work to the advantage of those who understand it and present their strengths accordingly. Thus, due to the life or creative skills of students, it will be more interesting to study at universities.
In conclusion, taking into account the opinion of a group of people, it can be concluded that only those with an excellent certificate should be accepted into universities, but I believe that in real life the selection committee should be based on skills and give chances to everyone.
Currently
,
many
students
are worried
about entering
universities
thinking about the election
program
.
Some
people
believe that the election
company
should accept
only
excellent
students
at their
university
, I give my vote to that group of
people
who
think
that other factors need to
be taken
into account.
On the one hand, for starters it’s worth noting that
Rather
than filling spots with well-rounded
students
,
many
colleges,
particularly
selective ones, seek to identify a mix of applicants
who
show
a passion and
very
deep talent in an area or two, and
because of this
they accept candidates according to the criteria of an
excellent
average mark. Although the quality of a leader will
help
ensure the effectiveness of learning, ideal
students
have a higher perception of material.
For instance
, by adhering to the introductory
program
at the best
university
in the world
-
Harvard, exclusively professional
students
are able to study at this higher education institution.
Additionally
, No matter how selective the
university
is,
student
grades will
probably
matter most. In put more
precisely
, Admissions officers place a high value on student's academic transcript as an indicator of how prepared
students
are for college work.
As a result
,
excellent
students
will ensure the prosperity of the university.
On the other hand
, I
agree
that the election
program
should give a chance to those
who
do not have an ideal average score.
Firstly
, Admission counselors consider a worthy candidate to be one
who
looks beyond the bounds of an assessment of evidence of leadership and individual value.
In other words
, it is
important
for
universities
to have
students
who
will
make
special
programs
that will
improve
the effectiveness of training. Even if academic preparedness talks about college preparedness, responsibility and leadership will push the
university
forward on a rating scale. To illustrate, At Roanoke College, it receives about 5, 500 applications each year and accepts about 72% of the candidates,
because
it is always looking for the potential and diversity of
students
.
Secondly
, Institutional priorities could
also
include finding
students
with exceptional talent in art, music or athletics or filling department-specific needs. Such a
so
-called holistic approach to admissions can work to the advantage of those
who
understand it and present their strengths
accordingly
.
Thus
, due to the life or creative
skills
of
students
, it will be more interesting to study at universities.
In conclusion
, taking into account the opinion of a group of
people
, it can
be concluded
that
only
those with an
excellent
certificate should be
accepted
into
universities
,
but
I believe that in real life the selection committee should
be based
on
skills
and give chances to everyone.