Tertiary education is essential for achieving success in life. Students, who get high band scores, usually get a chance to admit in universities, though older students and having a low-mark in school life should also be gotten excess into the higher education. From my perspective, all types of students both youngest with high-mark and adult students with low-grade must have a right to earn knowledge from universities.
On the one hand, pupils who earn standard marks in all his academic life, easily get admission at university. The reason is that professors at tertiaries think that since the student has achieved the highest position at school, he must have worked hard. Eventually, he will do a better result in higher studies, and cope with the workload and activities-related universities and its teachers. For example, in school, the top-rated students are disciplined and efficient so that they do their tasks efficiently and listen what their teachers are focusing on. Therefore, the dean of tertiary education selects those brilliant students who could do excellent results. Consequently, this selection generates a higher level of citizens, and socioeconomic will be strong for these intellectuals.
On the other hand, each student has the right to study at the university level. It is justifiable to say that if all students get a higher education, any nation will develop immediately. For that reason, universities should give chance to age-students as well as pupils who obtain the lowest marks at school due to the advancement of a country. For instance, in the USA, the renowned universities such as Harvard or Yale - provide their admission form for all types of students, but they should have a quality which could be anything whether skilled at sports, art or higher marks gained in the school certificate. As a result, no one is unemployed when university graduates get their certificate from tertiary education.
In conclusion, it is a controversial issue about whether universities should focus on selecting the top-rated students from intermediate level, or, whether they should select senior learners who did not cut a good figure on the previous exam. In my opinion, both types of students must be selected by the universityy for the socioeconomic growth of society.
Tertiary
education
is essential for achieving success in life.
Students
,
who
get
high band scores,
usually
get
a chance to admit in
universities
, though older
students
and having a low-mark in
school
life should
also
be gotten
excess into the higher
education
. From my perspective, all types of
students
both youngest with high-mark and adult
students
with low-grade
must
have a right to earn knowledge from universities.
On the one hand, pupils
who
earn standard marks in all his academic life,
easily
get
admission at
university
. The reason is that professors at
tertiaries
think
that since the
student
has achieved the highest position at
school
, he
must
have worked
hard
.
Eventually
, he will do a better result in higher studies, and cope with the workload and activities-related
universities
and its teachers.
For example
, in
school
, the top-rated
students
are disciplined
and efficient
so
that they do their tasks
efficiently
and listen what their teachers are focusing on.
Therefore
, the dean of tertiary
education
selects those brilliant
students
who
could do excellent results.
Consequently
, this selection generates a higher level of citizens, and socioeconomic will be strong for these intellectuals.
On the other hand
, each
student
has the right to study at the
university
level. It is justifiable to say that if all
students
get
a higher
education
, any nation will develop immediately. For that reason,
universities
should give chance to age-students
as well
as pupils
who
obtain the lowest marks at
school
due to the advancement of a country.
For instance
, in the USA, the renowned
universities
such as Harvard or Yale
-
provide their admission form for all types of
students
,
but
they should have a quality which could be anything whether skilled at sports, art or higher marks gained in the
school
certificate.
As a result
, no one
is unemployed
when
university
graduates
get
their certificate from tertiary education.
In conclusion
, it is a controversial issue about whether
universities
should focus on selecting the top-rated
students
from intermediate level, or, whether they should select senior learners
who
did not
cut
a
good
figure on the previous exam. In my opinion, both types of
students
must
be selected
by the
universityy
for the socioeconomic growth of society.