Different factors play a role in the success of a person in whatever he is doing. Some say to have great achievements in sport, it is a must to possess potential while others believe being diligent and persistent in doing exercises is more important than the body’s ability. This essay will analyze each view and based on the analysis, and in the final paragraph, the author will give his opinion.
For some, there is no doubt that in sport having the natural ability is important as it is in any other field to stand on the high ranks. They say our potentials may turn to something big if we work on them and make them active. However, if there is no potential at all, there is no chance to get something out of it no matter whatsoever we do. As an example, consider a person who wants to be the best in weight lifting but has thin and weak bones although has well-developed muscles. He will not be able to compete with somebody who has a body consists of big and strong bones and well-developed muscles. This simply shows that the potential has to be there.
Some refute the idea to be a champion in a sport you need to have the potential and they believe everybody has the potential and it is a matter of hard work and practice that decides who is the winner. Their example for this is Jiji Boof an Italian runner, who nobody sees any potential in him to be the champion of the Marathon. Nevertheless, he was exercising 10 hours every single day for five years and at the end, he won the competition. This shows that being diligent and persistent in exercises will finally pay for the price.
To recapitulate, It has been discussed that having natural ability is the predominant factor to be a successful sportsperson for some while others focus more on hard work and practice. In my view, both ideas are partially true and I believe is their combination which leads to a big achievement in sport and none of them alone is enough.
Different
factors play a role in the success of a person in whatever he is doing.
Some
say to have great achievements in
sport
, it is a
must to
possess
potential
while others believe being diligent and persistent in doing exercises is more
important
than the body’s ability. This essay will analyze each view and based on the analysis, and in the final paragraph, the author will give his opinion.
For
some
, there is no doubt that in
sport
having the natural ability is
important
as it is in any other field to stand on the high ranks. They say our
potentials
may turn to something
big
if we work on them and
make
them active.
However
, if there is no
potential
at all, there is no chance to
get
something out of it no matter whatsoever we do. As an example, consider a person
who
wants to be the
best in weight
lifting
but
has thin and weak bones although has well-developed muscles. He will not be able to compete with somebody
who
has a body consists of
big
and strong bones and well-developed muscles. This
simply
shows
that the
potential
has to
be there.
Some
refute the
idea
to be a champion in a
sport
you need to have the
potential and
they believe everybody has the
potential
and it is a matter of
hard
work and practice that decides
who
is the winner. Their example for this is
Jiji
Boof an
Italian runner,
who
nobody
sees
any
potential
in him to be the champion of the Marathon.
Nevertheless
, he was exercising 10 hours every single day for five years and at the
end
, he won the competition. This
shows
that being diligent and persistent in exercises will
finally
pay for the price.
To recapitulate, It has
been discussed
that having natural ability is the predominant factor to be a successful sportsperson for
some
while others focus more on
hard
work and practice. In my view, both
ideas
are
partially
true and I believe is their combination which leads to a
big
achievement in
sport
and none of them alone is
enough
.