Many people debate on what should be done about punishment on criminals. Some individuals believe that there should be standard punishment for every kind of crime and that should be followed while sentencing a criminal. Yet, some others argue that reasons of crime and background of executing crime should be considered while determining proper punishment for criminals. This essay will take a look at this issue from both points of views.
To begin with, people may agree to impose fixed standard punishment on criminals based on the crime they committed. By doing this, criminals will be punished according to the crime they made and it seems fair for everyone since they believe the bigger the crime, the harder the prison. For example, imposing the death penalty to both murderer and terrorist who have committed to the same type of crime seems reasonable to many people. It is a considerably equal crime and therefore, they should be punished by death sentence. When someone kills a person, no matter what was the reason, s/he should be punished according to the predetermined laws.
On the other hand, others argue that in determining the proper punishment for criminals, there should be some considerations of what were the motives of crime and also the background of criminals. There must be different punishment between a serial killer and someone who was forced to kill for self-defending. Applying same punishment to the woman who stole a loaf of bread from a store to feed her hungry baby and a corrupt government employee who stole millions of dollar to amass his wealth is not at all justified though stealing was the crime in both cases.
All in all, fixed punishment is needed to standardise punishment for different crimes. Nonetheless, there should be some considerations on motives and environment of criminals in imposing the proper punishment. 
 Many
  people
 debate on what should  
be done
 about  
punishment
 on  
criminals
.  
Some
 individuals believe that there should be standard  
punishment
 for every kind of  
crime
 and that should  
be followed
 while sentencing a  
criminal
.  
Yet
,  
some
 others argue that reasons of  
crime
 and background of executing  
crime
 should  
be considered
 while determining proper  
punishment
 for  
criminals
. This essay will take a look at this issue from both points of views.
To  
begin
 with,  
people
 may  
agree
 to impose  
fixed
 standard  
punishment
 on  
criminals
 based on the  
crime
 they committed. By doing this,  
criminals
 will  
be punished
 according to the  
crime
 they made and it seems  
fair
 for everyone since they believe the bigger the  
crime
, the harder the prison.  
For example
, imposing the death penalty to both murderer and terrorist  
who
 have committed to the same type of  
crime
 seems reasonable to  
many
  people
. It is a  
considerably
 equal  
crime
 and  
therefore
, they should  
be punished
 by death sentence. When someone kills a person, no matter what was the reason, s/he should  
be punished
 according to the predetermined laws. 
On the other hand
, others argue that in determining the proper  
punishment
 for  
criminals
, there should be  
some
 considerations of what were the motives of  
crime
 and  
also
 the background of  
criminals
. There  
must
 be  
different
  punishment
 between a serial killer and someone  
who
  was forced
 to kill for self-defending. Applying same  
punishment
 to the woman  
who
 stole a loaf of bread from a store to feed her hungry baby and a corrupt  
government
 employee  
who
 stole millions of dollar to amass his wealth is not at all justified though stealing was the  
crime
 in both cases.
All in all,  
fixed
  punishment
  is needed
 to  
standardise
  punishment
 for  
different
  crimes
. Nonetheless, there should be  
some
 considerations on motives and environment of  
criminals
 in imposing the proper  
punishment
. 
 7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
33Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1Mistakes