Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both of these two views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. v.9
Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. v. 9
Certain people argue that every type of fault should be fixed punishment. But, others deem that firstly listen the purpose of behind the caper then deciding the beating.
In my first view, depravity is a bigger problem in the now. Some people, for completing their needs, they do abomination. Such as, robbery, theft and many more. Moreover, if the government allows this rule infraction may be reduced and criminals will think twice before committing any breach. For instance, in Saudi Arabia, if people do any type of depravity in this place. The government would only give capital punishment. Because, the main object of this law is reducing the infraction from this place and due to this rule crime has decreased in this country.
In my second view, Before giving any types of sanction. The government should see the motivation of behind the offence. Then, they should decide some about criminals lumps. For example, some time a man going to somewhere in the middle night and someone has attacked on him with the gun and man has also hit him with something to protecting himself. After that, suddenly attacker is a die. This kind of situation law cannot say it is murder. Because they have done this murder for saving himself. Therefore, these types of cases authority should see first what is the region at the back of the felony. Afterwards, they should choose his sanction.
To summarize, I think first of all nation authorities have to check the motive at the rear of the scandal. Then, they should take some action about criminals lumps.
Certain
people
argue that every
type
of fault should be
fixed
punishment.
But
, others deem that
firstly
listen the purpose of behind the caper then deciding the beating.
In my
first
view, depravity is a bigger problem in the
now
.
Some
people
, for completing their needs, they do abomination. Such as, robbery, theft and
many
more.
Moreover
, if the
government
allows
this
rule
infraction may be
reduced
and criminals will
think
twice
before
committing any breach.
For instance
, in Saudi Arabia, if
people
do any
type
of depravity in this place. The
government
would
only
give capital punishment.
Because
, the main object of this law is reducing the infraction from this place and due to this
rule
crime has decreased in this country.
In my second view,
Before
giving any
types
of sanction. The
government
should
see
the motivation of behind the
offence
. Then, they should decide
some
about criminals lumps.
For example
,
some
time a
man
going to somewhere
in the middle night and someone has attacked on him with the gun and
man
has
also
hit him with something to protecting himself. After that,
suddenly
attacker is a
die
. This kind of situation law cannot say it is murder.
Because
they have done this murder for saving himself.
Therefore
, these
types
of cases authority should
see
first
what is the region at the back of the felony. Afterwards, they should choose his sanction.
To summarize
, I
think
first of all
nation authorities
have to
check
the motive at the rear of the scandal. Then, they should take
some
action about criminals lumps.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8Mistakes