Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. v.11

Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. v. 11
Have you ever thought about being a judge? There may be various situations in our daily lives in which our judgments are needed to be expressed. But is it really as simple as the situations we encounter every day when it comes to judging serious crimes? For a long time, it has been a controversial issue whether there must be fixed punishments for any kind of crime or the incentive is an influential factor that is crucial to be considered. I personally approve of the latter belief since there are a lot of crimes in which the criminal is not really guilty. On the one hand, a group of people dogmatically believe the punishment for any crime ought to be fixed regardless of the crime’s motive. They state that if felons know there is severe punishment even for small crimes, they are hindered and will never attempt to commit a crime. Therefore, the violence and crime rates decline considerably and thus a better society we will have. For instance, in Saudi Arabia, the punishment for robbery is of one the robber’s hands being cut irrespective of what he has stolen, an apple or a car. On the other hand, the other group of society argues that where the felony stems from must be investigated and the motivation should be taken into consideration when sentencing a criminal. As a justification, they cite that there are situations in which the crime has not been done deliberately or the culprit is not the real wrongdoer. In particular, in an involuntary homicide, the killer might be the victim since it might have a self-defense or a robbery for feeding a family differs from robbing for profit. In this case, the judge is who can decide the best penalty considering every aspect and condition of crime perpetration. On the whole, even though fixed punishments can be extremely beneficial in the decrease of crime rate and may culminate in a safer society, the justice system should be flexible enough towards certain felonies and consider the crime’s rationale and conditions for giving the most appropriate verdict.
Have you ever
thought
about being a judge? There may be various situations in our daily
lives
in which our judgments
are needed
to
be expressed
.
But
is it
really
as simple as the situations we encounter every day when it
comes
to judging serious
crimes
? For a long time, it has been a controversial issue whether there
must
be
fixed
punishments
for any kind of
crime
or the incentive is an influential factor
that is
crucial to
be considered
. I
personally
approve of the latter belief since there are
a lot of
crimes
in which the criminal is not
really
guilty.

On the one hand, a group of
people
dogmatically
believe the
punishment
for any
crime
ought to be
fixed
regardless of the
crime’s
motive. They state that if felons know there is severe
punishment
even for
small
crimes
, they
are hindered
and will never attempt to commit a
crime
.
Therefore
, the violence and
crime
rates decline
considerably
and
thus
a better society we will have.
For instance
, in Saudi Arabia, the
punishment
for robbery is of one the robber’s hands being
cut
irrespective of what he has stolen, an apple or a car.

On the other hand
, the other group of society argues that where the felony stems from
must
be investigated
and the motivation should
be taken
into consideration when sentencing a criminal. As a justification, they cite that there are situations in which the
crime
has not
been done
deliberately
or the culprit is not the real wrongdoer.
In particular
, in an involuntary homicide, the killer might be the victim since it might have a self-defense or a robbery for feeding a family differs from robbing for profit.
In this case
, the judge is who can decide the best penalty considering every aspect and condition of
crime
perpetration.

On the whole
,
even though
fixed
punishments
can be
extremely
beneficial in the decrease of
crime
rate and may culminate in a safer society, the justice system should be flexible
enough
towards certain felonies and consider the
crime’s
rationale and conditions for giving the most appropriate verdict.
10Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
17Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0Mistakes

IELTS essay Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. v. 11

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
349 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts