Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. v.10

Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. v. 10
Some people argue whether criminals must always subject to fixed punishment for certain crimes, or whether situations for committing the crime should be taken into account before inflicting punishment. This essay will examine both sides of the argument and outline my opinion. On the one hand, criminal activities have reduced significantly over the centuries in the history of humankind. Fixed punishments like the death penalty, life imprisonment for drug trafficking deter an offender from such heinous crimes. The ruthlessness of such harsh punishments ensured safety and security in the society. For instance, according to a publication on criminal justice from the C. I. A, Saudi Arabia has been consistently ranked top regarding achieving a low-crime index due to its aggressive law for enforcing fixed punishments for designated crimes. Nevertheless, the main objective of the law and order is to protect the innocents and punish the wrong doers. The fixed punishment often contradicts with the fundamental objective of the civil society. On the other hand, persecuting a convict violate human rights; often without considering the aspects leading to such crime. Consider Saudi Arabia, ranked as the country with the lowest crime index in the world. The state’s implementation of a strict fundamentalist approach to persecute criminals regardless the circumstances of the crime has drawn flak from many human rights organisations. Amnesty International reported that fair trials are prohibited to criminals even if they are wrongly convicted. Finally, in my opinion, a convicted person should be given punishment only based on the circumstances and severity of the crime. For example, if someone murders in the act of self-defense, the verdict given should not amount to life-sentence. To conclude, inflicting fixed punishments may increase the safety and security of the society; however, it also violates the human rights a suspect is legally entitled to.
Some
people
argue whether
criminals
must
always subject to
fixed
punishment
for certain
crimes
, or whether situations for committing the
crime
should
be taken
into account
before
inflicting
punishment
. This essay will examine both sides of the argument and outline my opinion.

On the one hand,
criminal
activities have
reduced
significantly
over the centuries in the history of humankind.
Fixed
punishments
like the death penalty, life imprisonment for drug trafficking deter an offender from such heinous
crimes
. The ruthlessness of such harsh
punishments
ensured safety and security in the society.
For instance
, according to a publication on
criminal
justice from the C. I. A, Saudi Arabia has been
consistently
ranked top regarding achieving a low-crime index due to its aggressive law for enforcing
fixed
punishments
for designated
crimes
.
Nevertheless
, the main objective of the law and order is to protect the innocents and punish the
wrong
doers. The
fixed
punishment
often
contradicts with the fundamental objective of the civil society.

On the other hand
, persecuting a convict violate human rights;
often
without considering the aspects leading to such
crime
. Consider Saudi Arabia, ranked as the country with the lowest
crime
index in the world. The state’s implementation of a strict fundamentalist approach to persecute
criminals
regardless the circumstances of the
crime
has drawn flak from
many
human rights
organisations
. Amnesty International reported that
fair
trials
are prohibited
to
criminals
even if they are
wrongly
convicted.

Finally
, in my opinion, a convicted person should be
given
punishment
only
based on the circumstances and severity of the
crime
.
For example
, if someone murders in the act of self-defense, the verdict
given
should not amount to life-sentence.

To conclude
, inflicting
fixed
punishments
may increase the safety and security of the society;
however
, it
also
violates the human rights a suspect is
legally
entitled to.
9Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
26Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1Mistakes

IELTS essay Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. v. 10

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
301 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts