Some people opine that there should be specific punishment for every kind of crime. However, some argue that the reasons behind the committed crime should be considered before making a decision. While I believe that the punishment of a crime depends upon the circumstances in which it has occurred, this essay will discuss both views in the following paragraphs.
I do agree with the fact that the reasons behind committing an offence may vary and some of them might be valid. For instance, there are certain crimes which happen in self-defence. This means that the person who committed the crime might be innocent and kills someone for saving himself or another person. Moreover, there can be cases which involve mental torture or blackmail by a third person which compels a man or woman to commit an evil act.
Just as a coin has two sides, this argument is no exception. There are certain systems set by the government which make things equal for everyone. Rules are made with no exception, which means that they need to be followed by every member of the community. Failing which, it can lead to certain consequences. If the punishments change for some people, then it not only becomes unfair for others, but it also makes the system weak. This will make it easy for anyone to commit a crime and walk away scot-free by forging any fake circumstances.
In a nutshell, I conclude by saying that both sides have equal weightage. This decision should lie with the jury and a wise resolution should be made for any crime. 
 Some
  people
 opine that there should be specific punishment for every kind of  
crime
.  
However
,  
some
 argue that the reasons behind the committed  
crime
 should  
be considered
  before
 making a decision. While I believe that the punishment of a  
crime
 depends upon the circumstances in which it has occurred, this essay will discuss both views in the following paragraphs.
I do  
agree with the fact that
 the reasons behind committing an  
offence
 may vary and  
some
 of them might be valid.  
For instance
, there are certain  
crimes
 which happen in  
self-defence
. This means that the person who committed the  
crime
 might be innocent and kills someone for saving himself or another person.  
Moreover
, there can be cases which involve mental torture or blackmail by a third person which compels a  
man
 or woman to commit an evil act. 
Just
 as a coin has two sides, this argument is no exception. There are certain systems set by the  
government
 which  
make
 things equal for everyone.  
Rules
  are made
 with no exception, which means that they need to  
be followed
 by every member of the community. Failing which, it can lead to certain consequences. If the punishments  
change
 for  
some
  people
, then it not  
only
 becomes unfair for others,  
but
 it  
also
  makes
 the system weak. This will  
make
 it easy for anyone to commit a  
crime
 and walk away scot-free by forging any fake circumstances.
In a nutshell, I conclude by saying that both sides have equal weightage. This decision should lie with the jury and a wise resolution should  
be made
 for any  
crime
. 
 7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7Mistakes