A child's mind is extremely receptive when they are young and this time-frame is regarded as the optimal time to subject them to multifarious subjects. While some educators stress on the fact that academic syllabus must be inundated with all the up to date subjects, others regard this to be severely flawed and opine that pupils must be let to select subjects that suits their passion. Both these arguments need proper scrutinization before reaching a conclusion.
To begin with, educationalists quote that a child's education must comprise of multiple study subjects. They ascribe this trend to children having a foreseeable future. Furthermore, they also cite that in today's ever changing technology, it is imperative to be more than an expert in all study areas rather than confining children to a few ones. Mechanical Engineering course, for instance, comprises of different aspects of engineering such as computers, oceanography, telecommunications and so on. This ensures those graduates have a much wider probability of employment rather than their counterparts whose study is restricted to a few streams.
On the contrary, although there are multifarious cons associated with the above trend, of late, this is proving to be defective as it suppresses teenagers to a larger extent resulting in academic failures. To counter this flaw, psychologists strongly reckon that screening a child's desire and permitting them to study their favorable streams of study can undoubtedly yield a magical impact on the teenager be it on his or her intellectuals or in the academics. Many scientists of the past, for example, have followed their passion to study selective subjects and experiment it. They have never felt in the least bit pressurized but instead, found it way too interesting and eventually ventured to become well renowned researchers and philosophers such as Netwon, Pascal and others to name a few.
To sum up, although many senior lecturers cite that students must learn all the subjects as prescribed by respective study mediums to have better job prospects, others consider this practice to over-stress students most times. Instead, they advocate the view that identifying teenagers' aspirations and helping them to accomplish those which will yield greater dividends later. Gauging both views I strongly advocate the latter to be the must successful and believe that the positive spin-offs of this practice to be enormous
A child's mind is
extremely
receptive when they are young and this time-frame
is regarded
as the optimal time to
subject
them to multifarious
subjects
. While
some
educators
stress
on the fact that academic syllabus
must
be inundated
with all the up to date
subjects
, others regard this to be
severely
flawed and opine that pupils
must
be
let
to select
subjects
that suits their passion. Both these arguments need proper scrutinization
before
reaching a conclusion.
To
begin
with, educationalists quote that a child's education
must
comprise of
multiple
study
subjects
. They ascribe this trend to children having a foreseeable future.
Furthermore
, they
also
cite that in
today
's
ever changing
technology, it is imperative to be more than an expert in all
study
areas
rather
than confining children to a few ones. Mechanical Engineering course,
for instance
,
comprises of
different
aspects of engineering such as computers, oceanography, telecommunications and
so
on. This ensures those graduates have a much wider probability of employment
rather
than their counterparts whose
study
is restricted
to a few streams.
On the contrary
, although there are multifarious cons associated with the above trend, of late, this is proving to be defective as it suppresses
teenagers
to a larger extent resulting in academic failures. To counter this flaw, psychologists
strongly
reckon that screening a child's desire and permitting them to
study
their favorable streams of
study
can
undoubtedly
yield a magical impact on the
teenager
be it on
his or her
intellectuals or in the academics.
Many
scientists of the past,
for example
, have followed their passion to
study
selective
subjects
and experiment it. They have never felt in the least bit pressurized
but
instead
, found it way too interesting and
eventually
ventured to become well renowned researchers and philosophers such as
Netwon
, Pascal
and others
to name a few.
To sum up, although
many
senior lecturers cite that students
must
learn all the
subjects
as prescribed by respective
study
mediums to have better job prospects, others consider this practice to over-
stress
students most times.
Instead
, they advocate the view that identifying
teenagers
' aspirations and helping them to accomplish those which will yield greater dividends later. Gauging both views I
strongly
advocate the latter to be the
must
successful and believe that the
positive
spin-offs of this practice to be
enormous