Education has been evolving by leaps and bounds and providing teenagers with new avenues while keeping them up-to-date with today's ever demanding world. Therefore, a fair amount of people believe, these young adults should concentrate on every subject that schools have to teach. I do not completely agree with this opinion because interest based learning creates a more impactful result, such as domain expertise and a lasting and satisfying life ahead.
The most compelling reasons to study all the subjects is because it teaches different important core values to these youngsters. For example, Mathematics teaches problem solving skills, while Philosophy teaches ethics and morals. Another possible reason is the idea of Jack-of-all-trade in the working field. Many companies choose to hire people with multiple skills and domain knowledge, hence, this drives education institutions to push all their students to be one.
Despite the above arguments, I am of the view that avidity and passion are above all. First of all, when a person is ardent about a subject, no doubt that he/she would give his best effortlessly. This eventually drives the person to be expertise; For instance, being a computer programmer for many years, one can easily spot errors and fix it effortlessly. Secondly, by focusing on the subjects that they loved, it creates a satisfying life, for instance, police offices who most of the time is a lifetime job.
To conclude, while both views are commonly held in the society, I believe that by focusing on domains that these teenagers good at is a better option. Not only one could achieve a high degree of expertise, but also an eventual fulfilling life. Given this situation, it is recommended that schools offer these options and not enforcing students to enrol in all subjects. 
Education has been evolving by leaps and bounds and providing  
teenagers
 with new avenues while keeping them up-to-date with  
today
's ever demanding world.  
Therefore
, a  
fair
 amount of  
people
 believe, these young adults should concentrate on every  
subject
 that schools  
have to
  teach
. I do not completely  
agree
 with this opinion  
because
 interest based learning creates a more impactful result, such as domain expertise and a lasting and satisfying life ahead.
The most compelling reasons to study all the  
subjects
 is  
because
 it  
teaches
  different
  important
 core values to these youngsters.  
For example
, Mathematics  
teaches
 problem solving  
skills
, while Philosophy  
teaches
 ethics and morals. Another possible reason is the  
idea
 of Jack-of-all-trade in the working field.  
Many
  companies
 choose to hire  
people
 with multiple  
skills
 and domain knowledge,  
hence
, this drives education institutions to push all their students to be one.
Despite the above arguments, I am of the view that avidity and passion are  
above all
.  
First of all
, when a person is ardent about a  
subject
, no doubt that he/she would give his best  
effortlessly
. This  
eventually
 drives the person to be expertise;  
For instance
, being a computer programmer for  
many
 years, one can  
easily
 spot errors and  
fix
 it  
effortlessly
.  
Secondly
, by focusing on the  
subjects
 that they  
loved
, it creates a satisfying life,  
for instance
, police offices who most of the time is a lifetime job. 
To conclude
, while both views are  
commonly
 held in the society, I believe that by focusing on domains that these  
teenagers
  good
 at is a better option. Not  
only
 one could achieve a high degree of expertise,  
but
  also
 an eventual fulfilling life.  
Given
 this situation, it  
is recommended
 that schools offer these options and not enforcing students to enrol in all  
subjects
.