When books were first invented and became popular, people debated whether they were a better alternative to oral narration. Nowadays, similar debates arose with the emergence of TV and computer games. In this essay, I will argue that each has its strengths and weaknesses and none could replace another.
Reading stories can pique children's imagination in ways that visual media cannot. I remember devouring the Harry Potter series and draw up in my mind a whole magical world. I would not have been able to do that if I had watched the movies instead of reading the books first. What is great about books is that they allow readers more time to think and process the information given, and let them come up with their own version of the story.
On the other hand, watching TV is better for people who like visuals. Whereas most books challenge readers to contemplate ideas and hidden meanings, TV and movies appeal to human senses, are faster means of information delivery and less demanding on the brain, thus becoming favorite entertainments of many. I have seen people binge-watch famous TV series such as Games of Throne and finish them within a few days. It would take much longer to finish the original books.
Computer games, however, are different from both books and TV. Although they are largely seen as a form of entertainment, even the simplest games require coordination skills and some strategic thinking. In that sense, playing games is more active than reading and watching TV. You may also need to work with others in a team towards a shared goal, whilst reading and watching are more of solo activities.
In conclusion, I believe that each has its own benefits and drawbacks and appeals to a certain group of people, and that none is better than the others. Children should be exposed to all these forms of media and instructed to consume them moderately.
(327 words)
When
books
were
first
invented and became popular,
people
debated whether they were a better alternative to oral narration. Nowadays, similar debates arose with the emergence of TV and computer
games
. In this essay, I will argue that each has its strengths and weaknesses and none could replace another.
Reading stories can pique children's imagination in ways that visual media cannot. I remember devouring the Harry Potter series and draw up in my mind a whole magical world. I would not have been able to do that if I had
watched
the movies
instead
of reading the
books
first
. What is great about
books
is that they
allow
readers more time to
think
and process the information
given
, and
let
them
come
up with their
own
version of the story.
On the other hand
, watching TV is better for
people
who like visuals. Whereas most
books
challenge readers to contemplate
ideas
and hidden meanings, TV and movies appeal to human senses, are faster means of information delivery and less demanding on the brain,
thus
becoming favorite entertainments of
many
. I have
seen
people
binge-
watch
famous
TV series such as
Games
of Throne and finish them within a few days. It would take much longer to finish the original books.
Computer
games
,
however
, are
different
from both
books
and TV. Although they are
largely
seen
as a form of entertainment, even the simplest
games
require coordination
skills
and
some
strategic thinking. In that sense, playing
games
is more active than reading and watching TV. You may
also
need to work with others in a team towards a shared goal, whilst reading and watching are more of solo activities.
In conclusion
, I believe that each has its
own
benefits and drawbacks and appeals to a certain group of
people
, and that none is better than the others. Children should
be exposed
to all these forms of media and instructed to consume them
moderately
.
(327 words)