Nowadays, certain folks elaborate creative activities such as music could be a part of, school curriculum. In contrast, others argue that computing and science should be given the preference. In my view, following the complete range of subjects along with music at primary level is necessary despite the difficulty in lesson time allocation. In short, the necessity of musics can be fulfilled at primary's. Although continuing computer and science up to the academic level is vital.
Firstly, variations of the thesis and creative skills are important to create the fundamental intelligence of teenagers, furthermore student satisfaction from creative arts encourages them for studies. Such as, hip-hop cultural and jazz performances to improve social integration as well as shaping students with creativity. As a result, a healthy mind will contribute to the society in many ways. In a word, a person with creative activity such as music would keep him and others happy.
On the other hand, at academy level students should be given the opportunity to concentrate on the main subjects, while creative practices as a hobby of after school. To illustrate, computer's as hardware, software and networking along with biology and chemistry expanded range of subcategories, which are vital as well as time consuming. Lesson time, allocating during institution hours will be hectic for teachers and the management. In short, more time and effort is necessary to teach computing and scientific lessons, which is important for job prosperity in future.
In conclusion, based on job prosperity, technical subjects like IT and science should be up to academic standards, while musics only at primary levels, will benefit learners at academic or work. In my opinion, parents and teachers should collaborate together to expose their children to identify learning periods for extra subjects. In short, success relies on contribution towards knowledge.
Nowadays, certain folks elaborate
creative
activities such as
music
could be a part of, school curriculum.
In contrast
, others argue that computing and science should be
given
the preference. In my view, following the complete range of
subjects
along with
music
at primary
level
is necessary despite the difficulty in lesson
time
allocation.
In
short, the necessity of
musics
can
be fulfilled
at primary's. Although continuing computer and science up to the academic
level
is vital.
Firstly
, variations of the thesis and
creative
skills
are
important
to create the fundamental intelligence of
teenagers
,
furthermore
student satisfaction from
creative
arts encourages them for studies. Such as, hip-hop cultural and jazz performances to
improve
social integration
as well
as shaping students with creativity.
As a result
, a healthy mind will contribute to the society in
many
ways. In a word, a person with
creative
activity such as
music
would
keep
him
and others
happy.
On the other hand
, at academy
level
students should be
given
the opportunity to concentrate on the main
subjects
, while
creative
practices as a hobby of after school. To illustrate, computer's as hardware, software and networking along with biology and chemistry expanded range of subcategories, which are vital
as well
as
time consuming
. Lesson
time
, allocating during institution hours will be hectic for teachers and the management. In short, more
time
and effort is necessary to teach computing and scientific lessons, which is
important
for job prosperity
in future
.
In conclusion
, based on job prosperity, technical
subjects
like IT and science should be up to academic standards, while
musics
only
at primary
levels
, will benefit learners at academic or work.
In
my opinion, parents and teachers should collaborate together to expose their children to identify learning periods for extra
subjects
.
In
short, success relies on contribution towards knowledge.