The curriculum is updated regularly according to the needs, interests or abilities of the learners. Owing to this, some educationalist believes that the syllabus should focus on subjects related to science and technology rather than focusing on the music. I argue that teaching science has more benefits than music; however, this cannot be the reason to drop the music subject from the syllabus.
Studying IT and science course provides better job opportunities to the students. Everyone around the globe is talking about intelligent robots, self-driving cars and colonization of Mars. This goal cannot be achieved unless there are enough skilled researchers and engineers. The demand, for instance, for students graduating from science course is ten times more than any other field. Adding to this, the world is facing scarcity of talented researchers in various fields because of which probability of getting a well-paid job is higher than any other field.
Having said that, studying science is not everyone's cup of tea. To succeed in the scientific field, one should be comfortable with mathematics, physics and chemistry. Not every student is interested in studying these subjects; therefore they must be provided with other choices such as music. Besides this, some students are born with an innate talent for music, which makes them more successful in the field of entertainment. For example, Arijit Singh, a well-known singer from India, is far more famous than that of many scientists and researchers. Therefore, excluding the music from the curriculum is not justifiable.
In conclusion, I agree that studies in the field of science and computers provide better opportunities for graduates. However, this cannot be a reason to stop teaching music as some students might have the talent to excel in the field of music.
The curriculum
is updated
regularly
according to the needs, interests or abilities of the learners. Owing to this,
some
educationalist believes that the syllabus should focus on subjects related to
science
and technology
rather
than focusing on the
music
. I argue that teaching
science
has more benefits than
music
;
however
, this cannot be the reason to drop the
music
subject from the syllabus.
Studying IT and
science
course provides better job opportunities to the
students
. Everyone around the globe is talking about intelligent robots, self-driving cars and colonization of Mars. This goal cannot
be achieved
unless there are
enough
skilled researchers and engineers. The demand,
for instance
, for
students
graduating from
science
course is ten times more than any other
field
. Adding to this, the world is facing scarcity of talented researchers in various
fields
because
of which probability of getting a well-paid job is higher than any other field.
Having said that, studying
science
is not everyone's cup of tea. To succeed in the scientific
field
, one should be comfortable with mathematics, physics and chemistry. Not every
student
is interested
in studying these subjects;
therefore
they
must
be provided
with other choices such as
music
.
Besides
this,
some
students
are born
with an innate talent for
music
, which
makes
them more successful in the
field
of entertainment.
For example
,
Arijit
Singh, a well-known singer from India, is far more
famous
than that of
many
scientists and researchers.
Therefore
, excluding the
music
from the curriculum is not justifiable.
In conclusion
, I
agree
that studies in the
field
of
science
and computers provide better opportunities for graduates.
However
, this cannot be a reason to
stop
teaching
music
as
some
students
might have the talent to excel in the
field
of
music
.