In the recent times, the society is suffering from the soaring rate of crime all around the world. Some intellectuals opine to devote more fiscal resources to prevent the root of the offences, whereas others consider that the penalty for the crime must get stringent. This essay will discuss both the views of the above notion along with my opinion.
To begin with, the former view of eliminating the origins of the crime is predominantly key to decline the rate of crime. This practice will not only reduce the episodes of offences, but also eradicate it from the community. Moreover, there are many circumstances and elements are there in the society, which provoke the people toward the atrocity. The local administrations have to identify such causes of the misdeeds and try to eliminate it by using fiscal and monetary policies. For instance, in many developing countries, the exorbitant poverty and unemployment escalate the victims towards robbery, prostitution and fraud. Therefore, a practice to reduce the origin of the crime is more effective for the prosperity of the society.
However, according to the latter view, the characteristics of rewarding such culprits must be modified and the legislation should form the stringent policies to create fear in the lawbreakers. The strict punishment of the offences puts a psychological pressure of the intentions of the evildoers. As a result, the potential incidents of the crime can be reduced. For example, the gulf countries having the extreme penalties revealed the minimal crime rate in their nations. Thus, the lawmakers have to come forward to stop such illegal activities by using radical punishments.
To conclude, to build the society more civilized, the authorities must have to conduct strict actions to deter the crime rates. In my opinion, the government should use the optimistic view to fade out the roots of the offences, which will benefit the large mass of the society as well as reconsider the legislation with provisions of the strict penalties.
In the recent times, the
society
is suffering from the soaring
rate
of
crime
all around the world.
Some
intellectuals opine to devote more fiscal resources to
prevent
the root of the
offences
, whereas others consider that the penalty for the
crime
must
get
stringent. This essay will discuss both the
views
of the above notion along with my opinion.
To
begin
with, the former
view
of eliminating the origins of the
crime
is
predominantly
key to decline the
rate
of
crime
. This practice will not
only
reduce
the episodes of
offences
,
but
also
eradicate it from the community.
Moreover
, there are
many
circumstances and elements are there in the
society
, which provoke the
people
toward the atrocity. The local administrations
have to
identify such causes of the misdeeds and try to eliminate it by using fiscal and monetary policies.
For instance
, in
many
developing countries
, the exorbitant poverty and unemployment escalate the victims towards robbery, prostitution and fraud.
Therefore
, a practice to
reduce
the origin of the
crime
is more effective for the prosperity of the society.
However
, according to the latter
view
, the characteristics of rewarding such culprits
must
be modified
and the legislation should form the stringent policies to create fear in the lawbreakers. The strict punishment of the
offences
puts a psychological pressure of the intentions of the evildoers.
As a result
, the potential incidents of the
crime
can be
reduced
.
For example
, the gulf countries having the extreme penalties revealed the minimal
crime
rate
in their nations.
Thus
, the lawmakers
have to
come
forward to
stop
such illegal activities by using radical punishments.
To conclude
, to build the
society
more civilized, the authorities
must
have to
conduct strict actions to deter the
crime
rates
. In my opinion, the
government
should
use
the optimistic
view
to fade out the roots of the
offences
, which will benefit the large mass of the
society
as well
as reconsider the legislation with provisions of the strict penalties.