It is true that buildings are the face of a city Therefore, some people say, it is better to build new museums and town halls in order to beautify the city centers instead of renovating the old ones. However I totally oppose this argument because of the reasons mentioned below.
To begin with, old buildings are not just buildings but they carry a tradition and culture to new generation. By demolishing these buildings, we will loose remaining monuments about our culture and tradition. But renovating these building and keeping it intact is good for many reasons. First and foremost, children can get a authentic and direct knowledge about the old tradition and culture. Knowledge about the history and tradition children usually acquire from text books and pictures which will not make any impact about those things, in children minds. However feeling and experiencing things makes a lot difference in children, they never forget something they have saw and touched directly. For example, stories about Mysoor palace ( a famous palace in India built by Tippu sultan) may not be interesting for children unless they see it directly. Another point is, these buildings are a treasure of old sculpture, which is priceless and cannot reconstruct by the current generation.
Moreover, the huge expenses, relating to construction of new museums and town halls will be a burden for the government. Instead government can use this money for other developments which is necessary for the society such as infrastructure and health care sector. However renovation is less expensive than the new building construction. Hence, governments can save a significant sum of money by renovating these old buildings and keep them as intact monuments for our ancestors.
To conclude, renovation museums and town halls is the better approach towards these buildings than constructiong new ones.
It is true that
buildings
are the face of a city
Therefore
,
some
people
say, it is better to build
new
museums and town halls in order to beautify the city centers
instead
of renovating the
old
ones.
However
I
totally
oppose this argument
because
of the reasons mentioned below.
To
begin
with,
old
buildings
are not
just
buildings
but
they carry a
tradition
and culture to
new
generation. By demolishing these
buildings
, we will
loose
remaining monuments about our culture and
tradition
.
But
renovating these
building
and keeping it intact is
good
for
many
reasons.
First
and foremost,
children
can
get
a
authentic and direct knowledge about the
old
tradition
and culture. Knowledge about the history and
tradition
children
usually
acquire from text books and pictures which will not
make
any impact about those things, in
children
minds.
However
feeling and experiencing things
makes
a lot difference
in
children
, they never forget something they have
saw
and touched
directly
.
For example
, stories about
Mysoor
palace
(
a
famous
palace in India built by
Tippu
sultan) may not be interesting for
children
unless they
see
it
directly
. Another point is, these
buildings
are a treasure of
old
sculpture, which is priceless and cannot reconstruct by the
current
generation.
Moreover
, the huge expenses, relating to construction of
new
museums and town halls will be a burden for the
government
.
Instead
government
can
use
this money for other developments which is necessary for the society such as infrastructure and health care sector.
However
renovation is less expensive than the
new
building
construction.
Hence
,
governments
can save a significant sum of money by renovating these
old
buildings
and
keep
them as intact monuments for our ancestors.
To conclude
, renovation museums and town halls is the better approach towards these
buildings
than
constructiong
new
ones.