Some people believe that it is better to build new museums and town halls instead of renovating the old ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge. v.2
Some people believe that it is better to build new museums and town halls instead of renovating the old ones. v. 2
Whether new museums and town halls could be built instead of renovating the old ones has triggered a spirited debate amongst individuals. Some argue that they should be renovated, while others believe new ones must be established instead.
First and foremost, new buildings must be established rather than improving the old museums and town halls. By so doing, the durability will be enhanced hence such buildings could last for the next decades. For instance, in Botswana, a town hall in a particular village, “Molepolole”, after continuous renovations over the years, collapsed following a heavy rainfall in 2015. Therefore, it is very clear that such structure was no longer capable of sustenance as it had been there for a longer time. As a consequence, valuables were destroyed, and the money which was spent on refurbishing the building had all gone to waste.
In contrary, improving the old town halls and museums saves the state an exorbitant amount of money which could have been otherwise be used in setting up a new building. Erecting a new structure is expensive than refurbishing an old one. For example, it shall account for a new plan, as result experts should be engaged, new building materials, and a plot for setting up such a structure within. Moreover, renovation would save the land as the same land is used rather than seeking for a new a land may be used for other projects instead.
In conclusion, it is worth noting that setting up new museums and town halls is beneficial in terms of saving the cost during harsh conditions as well as durability. However, I assert that renovating these buildings is the best option.
Whether
new
museums
and
town
halls
could
be built
instead
of renovating the
old
ones
has triggered a spirited debate amongst individuals.
Some
argue that they should
be renovated
, while others believe
new
ones
must
be established
instead
.
First
and foremost,
new
buildings
must
be established
rather
than improving the
old
museums
and
town
halls
. By
so
doing, the durability will
be enhanced
hence
such
buildings
could last for the
next
decades.
For instance
, in Botswana, a
town
hall
in a particular village, “
Molepolole
”, after continuous renovations over the years, collapsed following a heavy rainfall in 2015.
Therefore
, it is
very
clear
that such structure was no longer capable of sustenance as it had been there for a longer time. As a consequence, valuables were
destroyed
, and the money which
was spent
on refurbishing the
building
had all gone to waste.
In contrary, improving the
old
town
halls
and
museums
saves the state an exorbitant amount of money which could have been
otherwise
be
used
in setting up a
new
building
. Erecting a
new
structure is
expensive
than refurbishing an
old
one.
For example
, it shall account for a
new
plan, as result experts should
be engaged
,
new
building
materials, and a plot for setting up such a structure within.
Moreover
, renovation would save the land as the same land is
used
rather
than seeking for a
new
a land may be
used
for other projects
instead
.
In conclusion
, it is worth noting that setting up
new
museums
and
town
halls
is beneficial in terms of saving the cost during harsh conditions
as well
as durability.
However
, I assert that renovating these
buildings
is the best option.
17Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
35Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
2Mistakes