There is a widespread belief that modern society should replace employees who have crossed 55 years of age. Although some people believe retiring people above 55 been a negative development, I, however, feel it has had a positive impact in making the organization more productive.
Firstly, recruiting youngsters would impart fresh ideas which might rejuvenate a company. Further, due to the change in the education system young people acquire more innovative programs which often help an organization to grow swiftly. While I concede that high-level employees possess vast experience, as well as their advice, are worthy, the problem is aged people are less active and sharp than youngsters. A good illustration of this development is the new start-up company mostly prefer to hire a young individual. On the other hand, older people take advantage of pension schemes or they commence their own company.
Unemployment is another area of concern. Many developing nation faces a problem of lack of job opportunities among youth. Many supporters who believe to work until 65 years claim that people should be allowed to work for many years since they can contribute to the company with better skills and knowledge. However, I would argue that this trend will boost economic repercussions. Consequently, office positions will be taken by the elder generation instead of young ones. Thus, in order to keep the nation’s economy healthy, the certain age limit is to be strictly defined and fair chances to young generation have to be provided. To exemplify, if cricketers like Sachin Tendulkar and Kapil Sharma had not retired, then we could never get our marvelous Captain MS Dhoni under whose guidance our team won the World Cup.
To conclude, not only aged people are sluggish, but they also enhance unemployment among young people. Therefore, although I acknowledge that older people have sound knowledge of respective fields, I firmly agree people older than 55 years should give up work.
There is a widespread belief that modern society should replace employees who have crossed 55 years of age. Although
some
people
believe retiring
people
above 55 been a
negative
development, I,
however
, feel it has had a
positive
impact in making the organization more productive.
Firstly
, recruiting youngsters would impart fresh
ideas
which might rejuvenate a
company
.
Further
, due to the
change
in the education system
young
people
acquire more innovative programs which
often
help
an organization to grow
swiftly
. While I concede that high-level employees possess vast experience,
as well
as their advice, are worthy, the problem
is aged
people
are less active and sharp than youngsters. A
good
illustration of this development is the new
start
-up
company
mostly
prefer to hire a
young
individual.
On the other hand
, older
people
take advantage of pension
schemes or
they commence their
own
company
.
Unemployment is another area of concern.
Many
developing nation faces a problem of lack of job opportunities among youth.
Many
supporters who believe to work until 65 years claim that
people
should be
allowed
to work for
many
years since they can contribute to the
company
with better
skills
and knowledge.
However
, I would argue that this trend will boost economic repercussions.
Consequently
, office positions will
be taken
by the elder generation
instead
of
young
ones.
Thus
, in order to
keep
the nation’s economy healthy, the certain age limit is to be
strictly
defined and
fair
chances to
young
generation
have to
be provided
. To exemplify, if cricketers like
Sachin
Tendulkar
and
Kapil
Sharma had not retired, then we could never
get
our marvelous Captain MS
Dhoni
under whose guidance our team won the World Cup.
To conclude
, not
only
aged
people
are sluggish,
but
they
also
enhance unemployment among
young
people
.
Therefore
, although I acknowledge that older
people
have sound knowledge of respective fields, I
firmly
agree
people
older than 55 years should give up work.