Nowadays, there are some masterpieces which are well paid and help the creator to build their reputation, whereas the majority of artists couldn’t find the way to sell their work. There is a suggestion that the Government should take some effort to gain the balance of this inequitable problem. In my opinion, I totally disagree with this idea.
Firstly, this unfair situation is the motivation for artists to try their best to create. Thus, not only in art but also in any field of life, if there are no competitions, there will be no development. Competition actually is a nudge which helps each person to expand their potential. For example, when being compared with other creation, the inventors will have the tendency of learning new ideas and put more effort into their works. By this way, a masterpiece will be born. On the other hands, this inequitable situation is also a useful method for the artists to understand the demand of their customer.
Secondly, there are no standards for art because people have different taste with craft. For instant, a paint can be charming with somebody, but it is valueless with others. Moreover, judging other’s masterstroke mostly based on human emotion and the Government has no right to control it by any law. Furthermore, the painter can only master their work by feeling free. This is the reason why the creation cannot be constrained by any rule.
Conclusion, if the creators work hard and meet their customer’s demand, their desire for the achievement and being well known. However, if they put lots of effort but, still have to struggle in life, the Government should not take any solutions for this partial problem. Thus, art as well as the emotion can’t be forced.
Nowadays, there are
some
masterpieces which are well paid and
help
the creator to build their reputation, whereas the majority of artists couldn’t find the way to sell their
work
. There is a suggestion that the
Government
should take
some
effort to gain the balance of this inequitable problem. In my opinion, I
totally
disagree with this
idea
.
Firstly
, this unfair situation is the motivation for artists to try their best to create.
Thus
, not
only
in art
but
also
in any field of life, if there are no competitions, there will be no development. Competition actually is a nudge which
helps
each person to expand their potential.
For example
, when
being compared
with
other
creation, the inventors will have the tendency of learning new
ideas
and put more effort into their works. By this way, a masterpiece will
be born
. On the
other
hands, this inequitable situation is
also
a useful method for the artists to understand the demand of their customer.
Secondly
, there are no standards for art
because
people
have
different
taste with craft. For instant, a paint can be charming with somebody,
but
it is valueless with others.
Moreover
, judging
other’s
masterstroke
mostly
based on human emotion and the
Government
has no right to control it by any law.
Furthermore
, the painter can
only
master their
work
by feeling free. This is the reason why the creation cannot
be constrained
by any
rule
.
Conclusion, if the creators
work
hard
and
meet
their customer’s demand, their desire for the achievement and being well known.
However
, if they put lots of effort
but
,
still
have to
struggle in life, the
Government
should not take any solutions for this partial problem.
Thus
, art
as well
as the emotion can’t
be forced
.