It is often argued by some that in most of the corporation opinions are decided by the supervisors, while others opine that it is more excellent to involve the team members when they make the judgment. Whilst a discussion of both these views is worthwhile, I am a supporter of the latter view.
On the one hand, deciding the organisational decisions by the directors aid to improve the company's growth. In other words, they will know how to deal with the customer to get the business and complete the project as per the schedule. For example, in most of the multinational companies, the deciding factor for any of the tasks is made by the managers in order to fulfil the requirements of the company and make it be reputed concern in this competitive world. However, I do not support this notion because the workers will be pressurized when their boss taking the decisions without knowing the real fact about the capability of completing the work.
On the other hand, involving the staff members during the decision making helps to understand the nature of the task in a better method. That is to say that employees have the hands-on experience on a particular task and if they were included it will aid to provide an excellent result in the work. For instance, people in the team know the criticality of the project and they will have new ideas to complete the task on time without any slippage in their timelines. In my opinion, I believe that including the members of their board while taking any decisions will aid to gain knowledge about the project and also come up with new ideas to develop the company.
In conclusion, although it is believed by some that the company's decisions should be decided by the controller because it helps in the growth of the conglomerates, I think that including the members of the group will aid in better understanding of the work and provide meaningful thought for the betterment of the group. 
It is  
often
 argued by  
some
 that in most of the corporation opinions  
are decided
 by the supervisors, while others opine that it is more excellent to involve the team  
members
 when they  
make
 the judgment. Whilst a discussion of both these views is worthwhile, I am a supporter of the latter view.
On the one hand, deciding the  
organisational
  decisions
 by the directors  
aid
 to  
improve
 the  
company
's growth.  
In other words
, they will know how to deal with the customer to  
get
 the business and complete the project as per the schedule.  
For example
, in most of the multinational  
companies
, the deciding factor for any of the  
tasks
  is made
 by the managers in order to fulfil the requirements of the  
company
 and  
make
 it  
be reputed
 concern in this competitive world.  
However
, I do not support this notion  
because
 the workers will  
be pressurized
 when their boss taking the  
decisions
 without knowing the real fact about the capability of completing the work. 
On the other hand
, involving the staff  
members
 during the  
decision making
  helps
 to understand the nature of the  
task
 in a better method.  
That is
 to say that employees have the hands-on experience on a particular  
task
 and if they  
were included
 it will  
aid
 to provide an excellent result in the work.  
For instance
,  
people
 in the team know the criticality of the  
project and
 they will have new  
ideas
 to complete the  
task
 on time without any slippage in their timelines. In my opinion, I believe that including the  
members
 of their board while taking any  
decisions
 will  
aid
 to gain knowledge about the project and  
also
  come
 up with new  
ideas
 to develop the  
company
. 
In conclusion
, although it  
is believed
 by  
some
 that the  
company
's  
decisions
 should  
be decided
 by the controller  
because
 it  
helps
 in the growth of the conglomerates, I  
think
 that including the  
members
 of the group will  
aid
 in better understanding of the work and provide meaningful  
thought
 for the betterment of the group.