Some schools of thought assert that it is compulsory for children to learn a new language in school while the others believe children without talent should be immune from that. this is a controversial issue regarding the essential of learning foreign languages, and labelling students in class.
To begin with, weighing role of a new language affects on children is critical. Knowing a new language rather than the mother tongue allows children to communicate with the foreigners. Therefore, young people can socialize, open the networks and make friends with those come from many parts of the world. Furthermore, there are also several opportunities such as studying abroad with a scholarship or working in a foreign country are provided to students with foreign language ability. For instance, many young Vietnamese students who successfully won scholarships from various universities in the U. S, due to the ability of fluently using English. Additionally, scientific researches have proved that learning another language enhance the brain performance to certain extent, and by virtue of that, the children capacity is also improve in a general scale.
Despite such benefits from learning a foreign language, the act of labelling students in the case of young learners who is not success in learning language is unacceptable and irresponsible. The discouragement that those received may be harmful to the overall development of them in the future. Weak students may leave school in early stage of life because of that, and hence, this must be eliminated at all cost. In turn, it is critical point out to the young generations the necessary of acquiring another language as this may nurture the love of learning languages in each children.
To conclude, students should be encouraged to learn another language for their own benefits rather than applying enforcement on all or discouragement on less talented learners.
Some
schools of
thought
assert that it is compulsory for
children
to learn a new
language
in school while the others believe
children
without talent should be immune from that.
this
is a controversial issue regarding the essential of
learning
foreign
languages
, and labelling
students
in
class
.
To
begin
with, weighing role of a new
language
affects on
children
is critical. Knowing a new
language
rather
than the mother tongue
allows
children
to communicate with the foreigners.
Therefore
,
young
people
can socialize, open the networks and
make
friends with those
come
from
many
parts of the world.
Furthermore
, there are
also
several opportunities such as studying abroad with a scholarship or working in a
foreign
country
are provided
to
students
with
foreign
language
ability.
For instance
,
many
young
Vietnamese
students
who
successfully
won scholarships from various universities in the U. S, due to the ability of
fluently
using English.
Additionally
, scientific researches have proved that
learning
another
language
enhance the brain performance to certain extent, and by virtue of that, the
children
capacity is
also
improve
in a general scale.
Despite such benefits from
learning
a
foreign
language
, the act of labelling
students
in the case of
young
learners who is not success in
learning
language
is unacceptable and irresponsible. The discouragement that those received may be harmful to the
overall
development of them in the future. Weak
students
may
leave
school in early stage of life
because
of that, and
hence
, this
must
be eliminated
at all cost. In turn, it is critical point out to the
young
generations the necessary of acquiring another
language
as this may nurture the
love
of
learning
languages
in each
children
.
To conclude
,
students
should
be encouraged
to learn another
language
for their
own
benefits
rather
than applying enforcement on all or discouragement on less talented learners.