Some schools of thought assert that it is compulsory for children to learn a new language in school while the others believe children without talent should be immune from that. this is a controversial issue regarding the essential of learning foreign languages, and labelling students in class.
To begin with, weighing role of a new language affects on children is critical. Knowing a new language rather than the mother tongue allows children to communicate with the foreigners. Therefore, young people can socialize, open the networks and make friends with those come from many parts of the world. Furthermore, there are also several opportunities such as studying abroad with a scholarship or working in a foreign country are provided to students with foreign language ability. For instance, many young Vietnamese students who successfully won scholarships from various universities in the U. S, due to the ability of fluently using English. Additionally, scientific researches have proved that learning another language enhance the brain performance to certain extent, and by virtue of that, the children capacity is also improve in a general scale.
Despite such benefits from learning a foreign language, the act of labelling students in the case of young learners who is not success in learning language is unacceptable and irresponsible. The discouragement that those received may be harmful to the overall development of them in the future. Weak students may leave school in early stage of life because of that, and hence, this must be eliminated at all cost. In turn, it is critical point out to the young generations the necessary of acquiring another language as this may nurture the love of learning languages in each children.
To conclude, students should be encouraged to learn another language for their own benefits rather than applying enforcement on all or discouragement on less talented learners. 
 Some
 schools of  
thought
 assert that it is compulsory for  
children
 to learn a new  
language
 in school while the others believe  
children
 without talent should be immune from that.  
this
 is a controversial issue regarding the essential of  
learning
  foreign
  languages
, and labelling  
students
 in  
class
.
To  
begin
 with, weighing role of a new  
language
 affects on  
children
 is critical. Knowing a new  
language
  rather
 than the mother tongue  
allows
  children
 to communicate with the foreigners.  
Therefore
,  
young
  people
 can socialize, open the networks and  
make
 friends with those  
come
 from  
many
 parts of the world.  
Furthermore
, there are  
also
 several opportunities such as studying abroad with a scholarship or working in a  
foreign
 country  
are provided
 to  
students
 with  
foreign
  language
 ability.  
For instance
,  
many
  young
 Vietnamese  
students
 who  
successfully
 won scholarships from various universities in the U. S, due to the ability of  
fluently
 using English.  
Additionally
, scientific researches have proved that  
learning
 another  
language
 enhance the brain performance to certain extent, and by virtue of that, the  
children
 capacity is  
also
  improve
 in a general scale.
Despite such benefits from  
learning
 a  
foreign
  language
, the act of labelling  
students
 in the case of  
young
 learners who is not success in  
learning
  language
 is unacceptable and irresponsible. The discouragement that those received may be harmful to the  
overall
 development of them in the future. Weak  
students
 may  
leave
 school in early stage of life  
because
 of that, and  
hence
, this  
must
  be eliminated
 at all cost. In turn, it is critical point out to the  
young
 generations the necessary of acquiring another  
language
 as this may nurture the  
love
 of  
learning
  languages
 in each  
children
. 
To conclude
,  
students
 should  
be encouraged
 to learn another  
language
 for their  
own
 benefits  
rather
 than applying enforcement on all or discouragement on less talented learners.