It is true that many students approach School or University in order to get chance to have platform that lead them to their prospective jobs. Similarly, employers too looks for specific talents from relevant colleges where they hopes for better requirement matching of students with current available jobs. In both cases, school need to provide balance environment and culture to grow students personally as well as professionally. Students are not only looking for technical or theotrical advancement in their study but also hoping for preparedness for industrial challanges. In such dilemma, it is better to have dual intent policies implemntation by schools.
Generally, students and teachers, at school level, expect to have good academics only in terms of grades and no more than descent understanding in their major field of study. Anything more than just providing a quality education to students is sufficient for both teachers and students. On contrary to that, employers are not satisfied merely with good academics. At corporate level, other skills - communication skills, presentation skills - do not have less priority than that of technical skills. For an example, schools may have rigid syllabus over the past few years that just focus on mathematics and general
science. When compared to real life technology, is a bit different and of basic level. Students by studying general science at school do not get broader ideas and failed to develop their skills relevant to prospective fields. And such talents come at corporate level, they faces very different and advance technology in the market and may not get fitted into the market due to lack of relevant skills. Only educational policies become inadequate when preparing talent for future rife with technological advancement.
Mostly any corporate organization works in any primary field and also looks for talent which is relevant to their field. In such cases, students are not sure at school level about their long term visions. In such specific kind of requirements by employers, employers specific policy implementation may go wrong at initial level of education where common subjects of all fields are being taught. But while persuing major courses at University, such policy surely ameliorate chance of better employment opportunities.
It can be concluded from the arguments provided that, in case of general skills and requirements policies for students and teachers do not contradict those of employers. But when it comes to specific skills required by industry, school can not afford to prevent policy of other fields and strict to specific one. Perception towards policy of student is no more different than that of teacher and may also inclined to similar thought-process.
It is true that
many
students
approach
School
or University in order to
get
chance to have platform that lead them to their prospective jobs.
Similarly
,
employers
too looks for
specific
talents
from
relevant
colleges where they
hopes
for better requirement matching of
students
with
current
available jobs. In both cases,
school
need to provide balance environment and culture to grow
students
personally
as well
as
professionally
.
Students
are not
only
looking for technical or
theotrical
advancement in their study
but
also
hoping for preparedness for industrial
challanges
. In such dilemma, it is better to have dual intent
policies
implemntation
by schools.
Generally
,
students
and
teachers
, at
school
level
,
expect
to have
good
academics
only
in terms of grades and no more than descent understanding in their major
field
of study. Anything more than
just
providing a quality education to
students
is sufficient for both
teachers
and
students
. On contrary to that,
employers
are not satisfied
merely
with
good
academics. At corporate
level
, other
skills
-
communication
skills
, presentation
skills
-
do not have less priority than that of technical
skills
. For an example,
schools
may have rigid syllabus over the past few years that
just
focus on mathematics and
general
science
. When compared to real life technology, is a bit
different
and of basic
level
.
Students
by studying general science at
school
do not
get
broader
ideas
and failed to develop their
skills
relevant
to prospective
fields
. And such
talents
come
at corporate
level
, they
faces
very
different
and advance technology in the market and may not
get
fitted into the market due to lack of
relevant
skills
.
Only
educational
policies
become inadequate when preparing
talent
for future rife with technological advancement.
Mostly any
corporate organization works in any primary
field
and
also
looks for
talent
which is
relevant
to their
field
. In such cases,
students
are not sure at
school
level
about their long term visions. In such
specific
kind of requirements by
employers
,
employers
specific
policy
implementation may go
wrong
at initial
level
of education where common subjects of all
fields
are
being taught
.
But
while
persuing
major courses at University, such
policy
surely
ameliorate chance of better employment opportunities.
It can
be concluded
from the arguments provided that, in case of general
skills
and requirements
policies
for
students
and
teachers
do not contradict those of
employers
.
But
when it
comes
to
specific
skills
required by industry,
school
can not afford to
prevent
policy
of other
fields
and strict to
specific
one. Perception towards
policy
of
student
is no more
different
than
that of
teacher
and may
also
inclined
to similar
thought
-process.