It is often argued that schools are not relevant anymore since students can gain any knowledge through the internet nowadays. I do not agree with the statement because children need guidance and interactive learning which it is only possible at the classroom atmosphere is the best way.
Due to the ubiquity of the internet, information can be accessed by anyone from anywhere. This development creates new opportunities for students to further their knowledge on any topic, however without any guidance by their teachers, children may lose on the internet by consuming irrelevant and, even harmful contents. For instance, although many internet services provide child protection options to protect kids from hazardous context, a recent study finds out that students can easily crack the protection code and reach anything they want to find out. This situation makes students more vulnerable in terms of their psychological and education development.
Moreover, the internet can not provide an interactive learning environment as the classrooms offer. For example, students can excel their curriculum through the internet tools, however, since these platforms do not allow users to interact with the writers of the sources, the children finish the learning progress with some questions on their mind. On the contrary, in the classroom atmosphere, they can easily ask the unclear parts of the lesson to their teacher or even to their peers. Therefore, school education is the most effective method and will be remaining the same for a long time.
To conclude, although the internet provides students with great number of sources to advance their learning process, I believe that the internet can not take school education’s place since it does not provide any guidance to children as the teachers do and interactive learning is not possible like in the classrooms. 
It is  
often
 argued that schools are not relevant anymore since  
students
 can gain any knowledge through the internet nowadays. I do not  
agree
 with the statement  
because
  children
 need guidance and interactive  
learning
 which it is  
only
 possible at the classroom atmosphere is the best way.
Due to the ubiquity of the internet, information can  
be accessed
 by anyone from anywhere. This development creates new opportunities for  
students
 to  
further
 their knowledge on any topic,  
however
 without any guidance by their teachers,  
children
 may lose on the internet by consuming irrelevant and, even harmful contents.  
For instance
, although  
many
 internet services  
provide
 child protection options to protect kids from hazardous context, a recent study finds out that  
students
 can  
easily
 crack the protection code and reach anything they want to find out. This situation  
makes
  students
 more vulnerable in terms of their psychological and education development. 
Moreover
, the internet can not  
provide
 an interactive  
learning
 environment as the classrooms offer.  
For example
,  
students
 can excel their curriculum through the internet tools,  
however
, since these platforms do not  
allow
 users to interact with the writers of the sources, the  
children
 finish the  
learning
 progress with  
some
 questions on their mind.  
On the contrary
, in the classroom atmosphere, they can  
easily
 ask the unclear parts of the lesson to their teacher or even to their peers.  
Therefore
, school education is the most effective method and will be remaining the same for a long time. 
To conclude
, although the internet  
provides
  students
 with great number of sources to advance their  
learning
 process, I believe that the internet can not take school education’s place since it does not  
provide
 any guidance to  
children
 as the teachers do and interactive  
learning
 is not possible like in the classrooms.