Few people think that brilliance comes naturally while the rest of the people contradict by stating that we can improve our intelligence through learning. From my point of view, one needs to have intelligence inborn and only then can they improve through learning.
A section of our society argues that brilliance is innate. This can be related to an example of a class full of students with different levels of intelligence. To some students math comes naturally and hence they consider it easy. While few students face a hard time in solving basic math problems because it is not something that comes naturally to them. And this does not limit to scientific subjects. Many examples in the artistic field support this point such as Leonardo Da Vinci was considered a born-natural painter.
Improving one's intelligence through learning is something that the rest of the community agrees with. Just having an intelligent brain is not going to produce extreme results. Only through learning can one understand every aspect of a topic. The same example of students taken in the previous paragraph can help us understand this point. Two students whom math comes naturally will not have knowledge of a Pythagorean theorem unless they learn it. A scientist can prove to be a great example for this point as they are required to learn and understand the basics and the exceptions to make a new invention.
According to me, having an innate brilliance, being in any field of life, is a basic need. Unless doing something that one is natural at, he/she will not able to provide expected results. I draw my conclusion by looking at people who are unhappy and unsatisfied with their jobs because it is not inborn in them.
In conclusion, people who think having a great mind helps with being intelligent and people who feel that intelligence can be improved via learning make points which are to be considered inclusively as without one point, the rest would not come to be true.
Few
people
think
that brilliance
comes
naturally
while the rest of the
people
contradict by stating that we can
improve
our
intelligence
through
learning
. From my
point
of view, one needs to have
intelligence
inborn and
only
then can they
improve
through
learning.
A section of our society argues that brilliance is innate. This can
be related
to an
example
of a
class
full of
students
with
different
levels of
intelligence
. To
some
students
math
comes
naturally
and
hence
they consider it easy. While few
students
face a
hard
time in solving basic math problems
because
it is not something that
comes
naturally
to them. And this does not limit to scientific subjects.
Many
examples
in the artistic field support this
point
such as
Leonardo Da Vinci
was considered
a born-natural painter.
Improving one's
intelligence
through
learning
is something that the rest of the community
agrees
with.
Just
having an intelligent brain is not going to produce extreme results.
Only
through
learning
can one understand every aspect of a topic. The same
example
of
students
taken in the previous paragraph can
help
us understand this
point
. Two
students
whom math
comes
naturally
will not have knowledge of a Pythagorean theorem unless they learn it. A scientist can prove to be a great
example
for this
point
as they
are required
to learn and understand the basics and the exceptions to
make
a new invention.
According to me
, having an innate brilliance, being in any field of life, is a basic need. Unless doing something that one is natural at, he/she will not able to provide
expected
results. I draw my conclusion by looking at
people
who are unhappy and unsatisfied with their jobs
because
it is not inborn in them.
In conclusion
,
people
who
think
having a great mind
helps
with being intelligent and
people
who feel that
intelligence
can be
improved
via
learning
make
points
which are to
be considered
inclusively
as without one
point
, the rest would not
come
to be true.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7Mistakes