Nowadays, health plays an indispensable role in human life. While some managers, finance their staffs with the gym and sport club memberships as they believe that this bestowed a myriad of benefits for work, other employers argued that there is no use in doing this.
On the one hand, the idea that employers should provide subsidised membership of gyms and sport clubs for their worker is favoured due to several reasons. Firstly, it is clear that the improvement of workers’ physical health may lead to the growth of productivity. Besides, this can help them balance their work life balance. For example, a staff will work more efficiently if they have time to diminish their stress, which is better to compare to those who spend a huge time on working without physical activities. Secondly, by participating in gym and sport centres, ones’ job satisfaction will increase. In order words, employees would perceive themselves more valuable and thus become more attached to their work places.
On the other hand, there are several reasons why memberships at gyms would not be beneficial for the company. Firstly, the price paid for being a member of sport centres may be costly which will cut short unnecessarily company’s funding. This means that funding that once allocated for the development of the company will now use for the sake of employees which do not contribute directly to the performance of the company. Furthermore, workers should concentrate on their vital projects to complete the mission given by employers rather than taking an enormous amount of time to play sports. For example, if memberships are given, some employees might lose focus on their job, bringing negative impact to the overall results of the whole company.
In conclusion, although supporting the staffs to apply for a gym or sports club is essential, the cons of approving this policy may worth considering.
Nowadays, health plays an indispensable role in human life. While
some
managers, finance their staffs with the
gym
and
sport
club
memberships
as they believe that this bestowed a myriad of benefits for
work
, other employers argued that there is no
use
in doing this.
On the one hand, the
idea
that employers should provide
subsidised
membership
of
gyms
and
sport
clubs for their worker is
favoured
due to several reasons.
Firstly
, it is
clear
that the improvement of workers’ physical health may lead to the growth of productivity.
Besides
, this can
help
them balance their
work life
balance.
For example
, a staff will
work
more
efficiently
if they have time to diminish their
stress
, which is better to compare to those who spend a huge time on working without physical activities.
Secondly
, by participating in
gym
and
sport
centres
, ones’ job satisfaction will increase. In order words, employees would perceive themselves more valuable and
thus
become more attached to their
work
places.
On the other hand
, there are several reasons why
memberships
at
gyms
would not be beneficial for the
company
.
Firstly
, the price paid for being a member of
sport
centres
may be costly which will
cut
short
unnecessarily
company’s
funding. This means that funding that once allocated for the development of the
company
will
now
use
for the sake of employees which do not contribute
directly
to the performance of the
company
.
Furthermore
, workers should concentrate on their vital projects to complete the mission
given
by employers
rather
than taking an enormous amount of time to play
sports
.
For example
, if
memberships
are
given
,
some
employees might lose focus on their job, bringing
negative
impact to the
overall
results of the whole
company
.
In conclusion
, although supporting the staffs to apply for a
gym
or
sports
club is essential, the cons of approving this policy may worth considering.