Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. v.15
Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. v. 15
Smoking has inevitably been a concern of governments around the globe considering how to manage and educate smoking people. This is due largely to the danger of the substance contained in the cigarettes, nicotine. As its drawback may also occur for the people near the smokers, policies related to this, particularly in public places, should be taken into account; whether it should be banned or not.
I personally think that forbidding such dangerous activity will be much beneficial that it can prevent others from having a vulnerable respiratory system. Moreover, this can maintain the places so clean that people could always find them fascinating with less air pollution. However, governments should consciously provide some special places which, in this case, can be used for smoking.
On the other hand, people who have currently been addicted to smoke would feel hard to avoid smoking in such places. As a result, they may smoke breaking the rule and not even feeling guilty. For this reason, there are two steps then to encounter this probable emerging problem. First, some strict law and appropriate punishment such as to pay more tax or to give any charity orphans or others needing. Second, education is one of the most prominent and essential ways to change peoples’ belief in terms of having their cigarette burnt.
However, banning such activity in public places is not merely a way to prevent others from the harms of smokes, but it will, to a larger extent, possibly be able to elevate people’s awareness of how dangerous smoking is.
To sum up, despite being a hard thing for smokers to not smoke, the policy which bans smoking in public places should be applied in order to save others. Nonetheless, people’s education in terms of the drawbacks of smoking is a part of this aim.
Smoking
has
inevitably
been a concern of
governments
around the globe considering how to manage and educate
smoking
people
. This is due
largely
to the
danger
of the substance contained in the cigarettes, nicotine. As its drawback may
also
occur for the
people
near the smokers, policies related to this,
particularly
in public
places
, should
be taken
into account; whether it should
be banned
or not.
I
personally
think
that forbidding such
dangerous
activity will be much beneficial that it can
prevent
others from having a vulnerable respiratory system.
Moreover
, this can maintain the
places
so
clean that
people
could always find them fascinating with less air pollution.
However
,
governments
should
consciously
provide
some
special
places
which,
in this case
, can be
used
for smoking.
On the
other
hand,
people
who have
currently
been addicted
to
smoke
would feel
hard
to avoid
smoking
in such
places
.
As a result
, they may
smoke
breaking the
rule
and not even feeling guilty.
For this reason
, there are two steps then to encounter this probable emerging problem.
First
,
some
strict law and appropriate punishment such as to pay more tax or to give any charity orphans or others needing. Second, education is one of the most prominent and essential ways to
change
peoples’
belief in terms of having their cigarette burnt.
However
, banning such activity in public
places
is not
merely
a way to
prevent
others from the harms of
smokes
,
but
it will, to a larger extent,
possibly
be able to elevate
people’s
awareness of how
dangerous
smoking
is.
To sum up, despite being a
hard
thing for smokers to not
smoke
, the policy which bans
smoking
in public
places
should
be applied
in order to save others. Nonetheless,
people’s
education in terms of the drawbacks of
smoking
is a part of this aim.
11Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
24Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0Mistakes