Medical studies have shown that smoking not only affects the health of the smokers but also has several ill-effects on the people close by. As a result, many are of the opinion that it should restrict smoking in public areas. Although there are views on both sides, I strongly believe that putting a ban is the most appropriate course of action.
The opponents of this argument think so because they have a carefree attitude. In other words, such people do not worry about how their actions can harm them and other people in their vicinity. For example, people smoke on footpath without considering that other people may feel uncomfortable and they do not have an option to move away in case it suffocates them. Without a doubt, legislation on smoking in public areas is needed to protect people who do not smoke.
Moreover, there are a plethora of convincing arguments in favour of a ban. First, tobacco contains carcinogenic components that can cause breathing problems and lungs or throat cancer to people who consume it and also to people who indirectly inhale smoke. For example, young children and old people who have weaker respiratory systems compared to adults are more prone to such diseases. Moreover, smoking in public fascinates young children to delve into it. In other words, teenagers and school-going children get attracted to cigarettes without being aware of its consequences. Indeed, smoking in public places not just affects health but also spoils youth.
In conclusion, it is clear that the government should ban consumption of tobacco in public places. To achieve it, there should be dedicated areas for smoking and strict punishments should be imposed on people who fail to comply. This improves the heath of thousands of people and is most definitely a positive development.
Medical studies have shown that
smoking
not
only
affects the health of the smokers
but
also
has several ill-effects on the
people
close by.
As a result
,
many
are of the opinion that it should restrict
smoking
in
public
areas. Although there are views on both sides, I
strongly
believe that putting a ban is the most appropriate course of action.
The opponents of this argument
think
so
because
they have a carefree attitude. In
other
words, such
people
do not worry about how their actions can harm them and
other
people
in their vicinity.
For example
,
people
smoke on footpath without considering that
other
people
may feel
uncomfortable and
they do not have an option to
move
away in case it suffocates them. Without a doubt, legislation on
smoking
in
public
areas
is needed
to protect
people
who
do not smoke.
Moreover
, there are a plethora of convincing arguments in
favour
of a ban.
First
, tobacco contains carcinogenic components that can cause breathing problems and lungs or throat cancer to
people
who
consume it and
also
to
people
who
indirectly
inhale smoke.
For example
, young children and
old
people
who
have weaker respiratory systems compared to adults are more prone to such diseases.
Moreover
,
smoking
in
public
fascinates young children to delve into it. In
other
words,
teenagers
and school-going children
get
attracted to cigarettes without being aware of its consequences.
Indeed
,
smoking
in
public
places not
just
affects health
but
also
spoils youth.
In conclusion
, it is
clear
that the
government
should ban consumption of tobacco in
public
places. To achieve it, there should
be dedicated
areas for
smoking
and strict punishments should
be imposed
on
people
who
fail to comply. This
improves
the heath of thousands of
people
and is most definitely a
positive
development.