The earlier we can ban smoking in public places, the better it would be for the human kind. Having foreseen the same, many offices and governing bodies imposed a strict ban on public smoking. This measure is generally applauded by the majority of mass. However, the opposing minority interrupt this ban as an act of arrest on one's free will. Let us discourse on this moot issue below.
It is generally agreed and even proven with scientific studies, that smoking is injurious to health. Health problems that smoking can induce are numerous. Cancer is among the major detrimental effects of smoking on one’s health. As it is rightly displayed on the cigar packets, smoking is one of the primary factors leading to cancer. Furthermore, effects of smoking on the systemic and peripheral circulation in the human body are appalling, as put forward by medical experts. The havoc of this insane habit is so horrifying, that research points towards its possible harmful effects on unborn children, even. Smoking is considered as a culprit among the many, behind the congenital birth defects and anomalies.
Another factor significant to this context would be the financial constraints imposed by smoking. In many developing countries, where people work on daily wages, the habit of smoking has an atrocious impact on their quality of life. In the majority of the mediocre families, around the world, smoking drains the significant part of their family budgets. For example, I witnessed many problems with reference to my father being a chronic smoker and the financial crisis it caused.
The amount of carbon and other toxic elements exhaled to the atmosphere by active smokers has reached such dizzy heights that its effect on passive smokers is more or less a reality now. In fact, the effect of first-hand smoke is seen permeable to even the second and third-hand smokers in the spectrum. The significance of the public ban on smoking is not just justifying but a necessity as it calls for. As a result, it is widely banned in some offices and institutions. Awareness programmes are being conducted all around the world against this habit.
Though the public ban on smoking is an individual constraint to one's freedom, considering the passive effects of smoking I would strongly accord win the ban. In my view, this would be a punitive measure to safeguard the health and wealth of the public or the society.
The earlier we can ban
smoking
in
public
places, the better it would be for the human kind. Having foreseen the same,
many
offices and governing bodies imposed a strict
ban
on
public
smoking
. This measure is
generally
applauded by the majority of mass.
However
, the opposing minority interrupt this
ban
as an act of arrest on one's free will.
Let
us discourse on this moot issue below.
It is
generally
agreed
and even proven with scientific studies, that
smoking
is injurious to
health
.
Health
problems that
smoking
can induce are numerous. Cancer is among the major detrimental effects of
smoking
on one’s
health
.
As it is
rightly
displayed on the cigar packets,
smoking
is one of the primary factors leading to cancer.
Furthermore
, effects of
smoking
on the systemic and peripheral circulation in the human body are appalling, as put forward by medical experts. The havoc of this insane habit is
so
horrifying, that research points towards its possible harmful effects on unborn children, even.
Smoking
is considered
as a culprit among the
many
, behind the congenital birth defects and anomalies.
Another factor significant to this context would be the financial constraints imposed by
smoking
. In
many
developing countries
, where
people
work on daily wages, the habit of
smoking
has an atrocious impact on their quality of life. In the majority of the mediocre families, around the world,
smoking
drains the significant part of their family budgets.
For example
, I witnessed
many
problems with reference to my father being a chronic smoker and the financial crisis it caused.
The amount of carbon and other toxic elements exhaled to the atmosphere by active smokers has reached such dizzy heights that its
effect
on passive smokers is more or less a reality
now
. In fact, the
effect
of
first
-hand smoke is
seen
permeable to even the second and third-hand smokers in the spectrum. The significance of the
public
ban
on
smoking
is not
just
justifying
but
a necessity as it calls for.
As a result
, it is
widely
banned in
some
offices and institutions. Awareness
programmes
are
being conducted
all around the world against this habit.
Though the
public
ban
on
smoking
is an individual constraint to one's freedom, considering the passive effects of
smoking
I would
strongly
accord win the
ban
. In my view, this would be a punitive measure to safeguard the
health
and wealth of the
public
or the society.