Some people believe that corporal punishment works better for children. These people claim that physical punishment is the most efficient way to teach discipline to youngsters. This essay will argue why beating children is never the right way to instil discipline in them.
A few parents are overly concerned about disciplining their children. They insist that smacking will develop fear in the mind of the children and help them to keep them under control. However, this argument does not much water. Smacking might help in the short turn, but parents who regularly beat their children will eventually lose their support. Hence the idea that smacking is extremely important for discipline is completely preposterous.
Smacking children directly affects their brain and in the long run makes them rebellious. Furthermore, instead of forcing discipline on them, parents should teach it in a polite way. Studies have also shown that children who learn discipline on their own are less likely to waver from the right path even when they are tempted to do so. By contrast, those who learned discipline for fear of punishment will willingly choose the right path if they get a chance. Overall, the idea that smacking children is vital is ill-informed and dangerous in itself and could potentially lead to a far worse outcome for the society.
In conclusion, this essay argued that people who are in favour of spanking punishment have a flawed understanding of punishment and they are wrongly linking it to discipline. In my opinion, smacking a child the name of discipline is completely unacceptable. There are various other ways to teach discipline to youth.
Some
people
believe that corporal
punishment
works better for
children
. These
people
claim that physical
punishment
is the most efficient way to teach
discipline
to youngsters. This essay will argue why beating
children
is never the right way to
instil
discipline
in them.
A few parents are
overly
concerned about disciplining their
children
. They insist that smacking will develop fear in the mind of the
children
and
help
them to
keep
them under control.
However
, this argument does not much water. Smacking might
help
in the short turn,
but
parents
who
regularly
beat their
children
will
eventually
lose their support.
Hence
the
idea
that smacking is
extremely
important
for
discipline
is completely preposterous.
Smacking
children
directly
affects their brain and in the long run
makes
them rebellious.
Furthermore
,
instead
of forcing
discipline
on them, parents should teach it
in a polite way
. Studies have
also
shown that
children
who
learn
discipline
on their
own
are less likely to waver from the right path even when they
are tempted
to do
so
. By contrast, those
who
learned
discipline
for fear of
punishment
will
willingly
choose the right path if they
get
a chance.
Overall
, the
idea
that smacking
children
is vital is ill-informed and
dangerous
in itself and could
potentially
lead to a far worse outcome for the society.
In conclusion
, this essay argued that
people
who
are in
favour
of spanking
punishment
have a flawed understanding of
punishment and
they are
wrongly
linking it to
discipline
. In my opinion, smacking a child the name of
discipline
is completely unacceptable. There are various other ways to teach
discipline
to youth.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
26Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
5Mistakes