Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth amoung poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? v.1
Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth amoung poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? v. 1
Many people think that development nations ought share their money with poor countries for help them with education and food, while others believe that each country should be to responsible for looking after their citizens. Personally, I agree with the wealthy nations input their resources to undevelopment states, for the reason that this is the way to do a fair world.
In some governments with a comunist or welfare regime, it is commonly accepted that the best administration is which only is worried about their own borders. Actually, this type of ideology has worked, especially in North Europe, where people pay high tax with the guarantee that the state give health and education. However, this has failed as well, for example, in Cuba and Venezuela, where their authorities have impoverished their societies.
Hence, for the last argument, wealth government such as USA or European Union should help poorer nations, especially with their knowledge. In my view, the best way to help them would be with scholarship for the best students, where they learn how a country can get to be development, so this way they could encourage to people to out to the poverty. For instance, in Chile there is Fullbright scholarship which has helped to professionals with knowledge in different areas such as education, health and international laws.
In conclusion, the discussion about if wealthy states should help to poor nations is a topic that always will be vigent. In my opinion, as we live in a globalization, it is impossible that the government is worried only about their own customer. For improve this planet is necessary that the society be more cooperative, due to this way all can advance more further.
Many
people
think
that development
nations
ought share
their money with poor countries for
help
them with education and food, while others believe that each country should be
to
responsible for looking after their citizens.
Personally
, I
agree
with the wealthy
nations
input their resources to
undevelopment
states, for the reason that this is the way to do a
fair
world.
In
some
governments
with a
comunist
or welfare regime, it is
commonly
accepted
that the best administration is which
only
is worried
about their
own
borders. Actually, this type of ideology has worked,
especially
in North Europe, where
people
pay high tax with the guarantee that the state give health and education.
However
, this has failed
as well
,
for example
, in Cuba and Venezuela, where their authorities have impoverished their societies.
Hence
, for the last argument, wealth
government
such
as USA
or European Union should
help
poorer
nations
,
especially
with their knowledge. In my view, the best way to
help
them would be with scholarship for the best students, where they learn how a country can
get
to be development,
so
this way they could encourage to
people
to out to the poverty.
For instance
, in Chile there is
Fullbright
scholarship which has
helped
to professionals with knowledge in
different
areas such as education, health and international laws.
In conclusion
, the discussion about if wealthy states should
help
to poor
nations
is a topic that always will be
vigent
. In my opinion, as we
live
in a globalization, it is impossible that the
government
is worried
only
about their
own
customer. For
improve
this planet is necessary that the society be more cooperative, due to this way all can advance more
further
.
9Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8Mistakes