Is it prudent to say that parents shouldn' t punish their kids. . . ? Two diverse perspectives surface while meticulously evaluating this issue. One perspective answers the aforementioned question in the affirmative with utmost conviction whereas the other perspective makes its disapproval evident by denying its acquiescence. Personally, I have a proclivity towards the other perspective that children shouldn' t be punished.
Every child is different and not every child understands everything after convincing to do right things after mistakes. Some might remain as stubborn as rock and while some might understand as early as possible. In case of stubborn child, mild punishment will create psychology of not making more mistakes. This might help teenagers to keep them on track. But parents should punish their children when they have gown up. For example by considering age factor above 18 age children are capable of taking their own decisions and they can think about right and wrong side of coins. One research shows hat parents who punishes their kids of legal age, there are more chances that children choose wrong side and leave their parents. Whereas when parents punishes their kids by not using mental and physical harassment, there are more chances of being successful in future.
Some parents hit their kids by stick or any similar things this might leave scar on innocent minds for their whole life. Punishments like social service, cleaning their own room or garden or doing their laundry on their own, will generate feeling of guilt and this feeling in enough for behaving as well as doing right in the future. Every parents should build a healthy relation with their kids then by parents words only the kid will understand about his mistakes. This will not bring distance in relations.
Hence after a holistic analysis, it is evident that the points in favor of the thought that children should not be punished overpower the points in favor of children should be punished with its logic, cogency and rationale
Is it prudent to say that
parents
shouldn&
#039; t
punish
their
kids
.
.
.
? Two diverse
perspectives
surface while
meticulously
evaluating this issue. One
perspective
answers the aforementioned question in the affirmative with utmost conviction whereas the other
perspective
makes
its disapproval evident by denying its acquiescence.
Personally
, I have a proclivity towards the other
perspective
that
children
shouldn&
#039; t
be punished
.
Every child is
different
and not every child understands everything after convincing
to do
right things after mistakes.
Some
might
remain as stubborn as rock and while
some
might
understand as early as possible. In case of stubborn child, mild punishment will create psychology of not making more mistakes. This
might
help
teenagers
to
keep
them on
track
.
But
parents
should
punish
their
children
when they have gown up.
For example
by considering age factor above 18 age
children
are capable of taking their
own
decisions and
they can
think
about right and
wrong
side of coins. One research
shows
hat
parents
who
punishes
their
kids
of legal age, there are more chances that
children
choose
wrong
side and
leave
their
parents
. Whereas when
parents
punishes
their
kids
by not using mental and physical harassment, there are more chances of being successful
in future
.
Some
parents
hit their
kids
by stick or any similar things this
might
leave
scar on innocent minds for their whole life. Punishments like social service, cleaning their
own
room or garden or doing their laundry on their
own
, will generate feeling of guilt and this feeling in
enough
for behaving
as well
as doing right in the future. Every
parents
should build a healthy relation with their
kids
then by
parents
words
only
the
kid
will understand about his mistakes. This will not bring distance in relations.
Hence
after a holistic analysis, it is evident that the points in favor of the
thought
that
children
should not
be punished
overpower the points in favor of
children
should
be punished
with its logic, cogency and rationale