Annually, many students are graduating with different knowledge about their majors from universities throughout the world. The policies of universities forced students to do an exact program adopted by the educational committee of universities. No one can deny that programs are adjusted without any modification. Nowadays, universities usually adopted two methods for students to take classes first: taking various objects second: focusing on one object. There is a controversial question raises that about which of programs is better? In my opinion, I subscribe the first notion and will explain my reasons hereunder.
First and foremost, with the progressing technology, people need more information about life, also they should know the wide range of knowledge about their career to figure out their difficulties whether they confront with little familiar problems. With this policy, students can learn various objects and be informed about all matter about their major. On the other hand, the second policy says that students have to learn certain material, thus they are sophisticated in the specific branch of science but in another related area they have insufficient knowledge. Presumably, they will cope with some issues in their career, because comprehensive information about a profession is very practical for everyone.
Secondly, everyone has a special talent and interest flourishes in the suitable context. When compelling that students are educated in the wide range objects, universities provide the best contexts to allow that students recognize their orientation. Additionally, this approach helps that students would continue their major in high-level academic, such as master or doctorate degree with high efficiency. On the contrary, another viewpoint can lead to their talents not detected with any program, and even their interests are suppressed because they have not any opportunities. As the standpoint of statistic about Asian universities shows that students graduating with the first educational program are very satisfactory in their career because they work in the interesting context without any mandatory act.
In summary, universities strive to adopt the best education programs for their students; however, I think that first policy is better because not only students have wide range information about their major, but also they have a lot of chances for finding their interest for paving the way for flourishing.
Annually
,
many
students
are graduating with
different
knowledge about their
majors
from
universities
throughout the world. The
policies
of
universities
forced
students
to do an exact
program
adopted by the educational committee of
universities
. No one can deny that
programs
are adjusted
without any modification. Nowadays,
universities
usually
adopted two methods for
students
to take classes
first
: taking various
objects
second: focusing on one
object
. There is a controversial question raises that about which of
programs
is better? In my opinion, I subscribe the
first
notion and will
explain
my reasons hereunder.
First
and foremost, with the progressing technology,
people
need more information about life,
also
they should know the wide range of knowledge about their career to figure out their difficulties whether they confront with
little
familiar problems. With this
policy
,
students
can learn various
objects
and
be informed
about all matter about their
major
.
On the other hand
, the second
policy
says that
students
have to
learn certain material,
thus
they
are sophisticated
in the specific branch of science
but
in another related area they have insufficient knowledge. Presumably, they will cope with
some
issues in their career,
because
comprehensive information about a profession is
very
practical for everyone.
Secondly
, everyone has a special talent and interest flourishes in the suitable context. When compelling that
students
are educated
in the wide range
objects
,
universities
provide the best contexts to
allow
that
students
recognize their orientation.
Additionally
, this approach
helps
that
students
would continue their
major
in high-level academic, such as master or doctorate degree with high efficiency.
On the contrary
, another viewpoint can lead to their talents not detected with any
program
, and even their interests
are suppressed
because
they have not any opportunities. As the standpoint of statistic about Asian
universities
shows
that
students
graduating with the
first
educational
program
are
very
satisfactory in their career
because
they work in the interesting context without any mandatory act.
In summary,
universities
strive to adopt the best education
programs
for their
students
;
however
, I
think
that
first
policy
is better
because
not
only
students
have wide range information about their
major
,
but
also
they have
a lot of
chances for finding their interest for paving the way for flourishing.