The lifestyle of a common person and nature of reign has changed a lot in the past century, owing to the technological and educational advances. Some people think that the government has the full right to make decisions regarding the way of living of an individual, whereas some are with the view that it should be a personal choice.
To begin with, the administration can create a huge impact on the lives of individuals. Whatever decision is taken by it, is applicable to the whole community and thus, it is believed that the government should give verdicts on a way of living. For instance, a single person falling prey to the world of drugs and smuggling, can impact the lives of many. But, the administration has a law for the ban on these activities and can punish such person. This saves others from getting negatively influenced. Therefore, most of the governments try to make good decisions for the community.
On the other hand, it is believed that an individual has all rights to decide whatever they want to do. For example, in most of the countries, the administration has no right to interfere in the personal choices such as whom to marry, what to eat etc. As every coin has two sides, similarly, every right comes with a duty that others should not be harmed. As an example, in India, drinking alcohol is the personal choice of one, but the moment it impacts others, as in the case of drunk driving, it becomes a public matter and the law is authorized to punish.
To conclude, in these times, the lifestyle of public is impacted by both the government and the individual choice. It is important to draw a line to both the independence of personal choice and the administration's interference.
The lifestyle of a common person and nature of reign has
changed
a lot in the past century, owing to the technological and educational advances.
Some
people
think
that the
government
has the full
right
to
make
decisions regarding the way of living of an
individual
, whereas
some
are with the view that it should be a
personal
choice.
To
begin
with, the administration can create a huge impact on the
lives
of
individuals
. Whatever decision
is taken
by it, is applicable to the whole community and
thus
, it
is believed
that the
government
should give verdicts on a way of living.
For instance
, a single person falling prey to the world of drugs and smuggling, can impact the
lives
of
many
.
But
, the administration has a law for the ban on these activities and can punish such person. This saves others from getting
negatively
influenced.
Therefore
, most of the
governments
try to
make
good
decisions for the community.
On the
other
hand, it
is believed
that an
individual
has all
rights
to decide whatever they want to do.
For example
, in most of the countries, the administration has no
right
to interfere in the
personal
choices
such as whom to marry, what to eat etc. As every coin has two sides,
similarly
, every
right
comes
with a duty that others should not
be harmed
. As an example, in India, drinking alcohol is the
personal
choice
of one,
but
the moment it impacts others, as in the case of drunk driving, it becomes a public matter and the law
is authorized
to punish.
To conclude
, in these times, the lifestyle of public
is impacted
by both the
government
and the
individual
choice
. It is
important
to draw a line to both the independence of
personal
choice
and the administration's interference.