People have different opinions as to whether the architectural design of newly built houses should follow the same style of existing homes or follow their personal style preference. Personally, I believe that they should have permission to choose their own style.
The option to construct all alike buildings in a vicinity is beneficial for many reasons. In many countries, traditional thinking dictates that a house is a reflection of the wealth or social status of its owner. As a result, the owners of less attractive and less modern houses would feel inferior and less engaged in conversational exchanges with their neighbors. It is clear that this unfortunate problem is likely to cause social isolation and an overall decrease in life satisfaction in the long term. On a government level, since all buildings share a common design, the task of supervising the process of construction becomes easier and more manageable, ensuring these buildings satisfy construction safety requirements.
However, I believe that the aesthetic design of unique buildings has far more positive impacts on the psychology of humans and the towns as a whole. Living in a modern and dynamic environment which is usually associated with security and comfort is thought to boost our emotional wellbeing. Research has shown the correlation between poorly-designed buildings and the risk of health deterioration and academic underachievement. On a larger scale, the vivid image of a town with a unique style provides inspiration for foreign tourists to come to visit the town, which is conducive to the development of tourism and culture.
In conclusion, I concur with the idea that the resultant impact on culture and tourism and psychological benefits of building unique houses are no doubt worth consideration, although ensuring an identical design of all buildings in a particular area brings some benefits.
People
have
different
opinions
as to whether
the architectural
design
of
newly
built
houses
should follow the same style of existing homes or follow their personal style preference.
Personally
, I believe that they should have permission to choose their
own
style.
The option to construct all alike
buildings
in a vicinity is beneficial for
many
reasons. In
many
countries, traditional thinking dictates that a
house
is a reflection of the wealth or social status of its owner.
As a result
, the owners of less attractive and less modern
houses
would feel inferior and less engaged in conversational exchanges with their neighbors. It is
clear
that this unfortunate problem is likely to cause social isolation and an
overall
decrease in life satisfaction in the long term. On a
government
level, since all
buildings
share a common
design
, the task of supervising the process of construction becomes easier and more manageable, ensuring these
buildings
satisfy construction safety requirements.
However
, I believe that the aesthetic
design
of unique
buildings
has far more
positive
impacts on the psychology of humans and the towns as a whole. Living in a modern and dynamic environment which is
usually
associated with security and comfort is
thought
to boost our emotional
wellbeing
. Research has shown the correlation between
poorly
-designed
buildings
and the
risk
of health deterioration and academic underachievement. On a larger scale, the vivid image of a town with a unique style provides inspiration for foreign tourists to
come
to visit the town, which is conducive to the development of tourism and culture.
In conclusion
, I concur with the
idea
that the resultant impact on culture and tourism and psychological benefits of
building
unique
houses
are no doubt worth consideration, although ensuring an identical
design
of all
buildings
in a particular area brings
some
benefits.