People have different opinions as to whether the architectural design of newly built houses should follow the same style of existing homes or follow their style preferences. Personally, I believe that they should have permission to construct unique houses.
The option to construct all alike buildings in vicinity is beneficial for many reasons. In many countries, traditional wisdom dictates that a house is a reflection of the wealth or social status of its owner. As a result, the owners of less attractive and less modern houses would feel inferior and less engaged in conversational exchanges with their neighbors. This unfortunate problem is likely to cause social isolation and an overall decrease in life satisfaction in the long term. By contrast, constructing similar houses helps to develop a sense of community and unity within a residential area. On a government level, since all buildings share a common design, the task of supervising the process of construction becomes more manageable, ensuring these buildings satisfy construction safety requirements.
However, I support the view that the aesthetic design of unique buildings has far more positive impacts on the psychology of humans and a town as a whole. Living in a modern and dynamic environment which is usually associated with security and comfort is thought to boost our emotional well-being. Research has shown the correlation between poorly-designed buildings and the risk of health deterioration and academic underachievement. On a larger scale, the vivid image of a town with a unique style attracts foreign tourists to come to visit the town, which is conducive to the development of tourism and culture.
In conclusion, I concur with the idea that constructing unique houses has more benefits, whereas maintaining an identical design for constructing all buildings in a particular area is worth consideration.
People
have
different
opinions
as to whether
the architectural
design
of
newly
built
houses
should follow the same style of existing homes or follow their style preferences.
Personally
, I believe that they should have permission to construct
unique
houses
.
The option to construct all alike
buildings
in vicinity is beneficial for
many
reasons. In
many
countries, traditional wisdom dictates that a
house
is a reflection of the wealth or social status of its owner.
As a result
, the owners of less attractive and less modern
houses
would feel inferior and less engaged in conversational exchanges with their neighbors. This unfortunate problem is likely to cause social isolation and an
overall
decrease in life satisfaction in the long term. By contrast, constructing similar
houses
helps
to develop a sense of community and unity within a residential area. On a
government
level, since all
buildings
share a common
design
, the task of supervising the process of construction becomes more manageable, ensuring these
buildings
satisfy construction safety requirements.
However
, I support the view that the aesthetic
design
of
unique
buildings
has far more
positive
impacts on the psychology of humans and a town as a whole. Living in a modern and dynamic environment which is
usually
associated with security and comfort is
thought
to boost our emotional well-being. Research has shown the correlation between
poorly
-designed
buildings
and the
risk
of health deterioration and academic underachievement. On a larger scale, the vivid image of a town with a
unique
style attracts foreign tourists to
come
to visit the town, which is conducive to the development of tourism and culture.
In conclusion
, I concur with the
idea
that constructing
unique
houses
has more benefits, whereas maintaining an identical
design
for constructing all
buildings
in a particular area is worth consideration.