It is claimed that scientific researches should be directed and monitored based on governments’ policies instead of private companies. I agree with this statement and believe that more valid, accurate results can be achieved under the strict supervision and higher financial support of governments, without being influenced by personal interests.
Governments always allocate a significant part of the annual budget to scientific projects in different subjects which are performed in universities and other scientific institutes. As a result of such an economic support, scientific investigations which are performed in cooperation with governmental agencies will rarely be limited by economic shortages. Therefore, eye-catching developments can be achieved more conveniently, since scientists will only focus on the scientific part of their researches, rather than struggling to provide money from various sponsors. For example, military advances which are always controlled and funded by governments proceed non-stop, since there is not any financial obstacle to hinder their progress. The other advantage of the governments’ control over scientific projects can be observed in the accuracy of their results, which can be related to the precise, imperative regulations, all of which have been defined by legal authorities. For instance, the results of medical experiments about a certain newly formulated medicine can be easily regarded valid, because it is assured that such efforts have been done under specific regulations. The other significant feature of such controlled investigations is their general acceptance. To illustrate, when governments’ safety boards give negative criticism about the safety of a specific model of a car, its sales will definitely register a dramatic fall.
On the opposite side, some people believe that private companies can direct scientific projects better than governments. Although less amount of bureaucratic obstacles in such companies facilitates the procedure of researches, several other challenges such as lack of adequate fund resources and limited access to standard facilities will certainly influence the results, let alone their accuracy. For example, a scientist is obliged to reduce the number of samples or skip some of the experiments because of economic challenges of his/her private employer; as a consequence, the validity of his/her outputs will be questioned. Additionally, the personal interests of the major shareholders may direct the researches into a specific pathway, rather than the natural, scientific procedure. For instance, a private laboratory might be tampered by a food factory in order to refuse to disclose the presence of harmful accumulated toxins in its newly produced canned food.
In conclusion, scientific researches should be performed by governmental agencies, because it is less likely for such researches to be interrupted by lack of financial resources or standard facilities ― which usually occurs when done by private institutes. In addition, their results are more accurate and generally accepted, because they are achieved under strict conditions and cannot be easily influenced by private interests.
It
is claimed
that
scientific
researches
should
be directed
and monitored based on
governments’
policies
instead
of
private
companies
. I
agree
with this statement and believe that more valid, accurate
results
can
be achieved
under the strict supervision and higher financial support of
governments
, without
being influenced
by personal interests.
Governments
always allocate a significant part of the annual budget to
scientific
projects in
different
subjects which
are performed
in universities and
other
scientific
institutes. As a
result
of such an economic support,
scientific
investigations which
are performed
in cooperation with governmental agencies will rarely
be limited
by economic shortages.
Therefore
, eye-catching developments can
be achieved
more
conveniently
, since scientists will
only
focus on the
scientific
part of their
researches
,
rather
than struggling to provide money from various sponsors.
For example
, military advances which are always controlled and funded by
governments
proceed non-
stop
, since there is not any financial obstacle to hinder their progress. The
other
advantage of the
governments’
control over
scientific
projects can
be observed
in the accuracy of their
results
, which can
be related
to the precise, imperative regulations, all of which have
been defined
by legal authorities.
For instance
, the
results
of medical experiments about a certain
newly
formulated medicine can be
easily
regarded valid,
because
it
is assured
that such efforts have
been done
under specific regulations. The
other
significant feature of such controlled investigations is their general acceptance. To illustrate, when
governments’
safety boards give
negative
criticism about the safety of a specific model of a car, its sales will definitely register a dramatic fall.
On the opposite side,
some
people
believe that
private
companies
can direct
scientific
projects better than
governments
. Although less amount of bureaucratic obstacles in such
companies
facilitates the procedure of
researches
, several
other
challenges such as lack of adequate fund resources and limited access to standard facilities will
certainly
influence the
results
,
let
alone their accuracy.
For example
, a scientist
is obliged
to
reduce
the number of samples or skip
some of the
experiments
because
of economic challenges of his/her
private
employer; as a consequence, the validity of his/her outputs will
be questioned
.
Additionally
, the personal interests of the major shareholders may direct the
researches
into a specific pathway,
rather
than the natural,
scientific
procedure.
For instance
, a
private
laboratory might
be tampered
by a food factory in order to refuse to disclose the presence of harmful accumulated toxins in its
newly
produced canned food.
In conclusion
,
scientific
researches
should
be performed
by governmental agencies,
because
it is less likely for such
researches
to
be interrupted
by lack of financial resources or standard facilities ― which
usually
occurs when done by
private
institutes.
In addition
, their
results
are more accurate and
generally
accepted
,
because
they
are achieved
under strict conditions and cannot be
easily
influenced by
private
interests.