The Government should manage and execute scientific findings instead of privately owned organisations. It is agreed that the government should take charge of scientific research. This essay will first discuss the financial benefits accessible by the government and the quality of scientific research when handled by the government.
Firstly, the government is in charge of the monetary policy and would have adequate access to funds to carry out a scientific project. It is an established truth that scientific projects are costly and would need a financially capable body to handle it, the government being the body that controls the flow of funds would have little or no issue funding scientific works as compared to a private organisation with limited funds. For example, when the Ebola virus broke out, W. H. O which is a government body had deployed scientist in Africa to curb the illness caused by the virus.
Secondly, scientific findings handled by the government are usually of high standards and have good quality. Because of the large network the government possesses, when carrying out research they are accessible to experts from other countries in that field. The Government is aware they are answerable to the people and having a reputation to protect are also expected to give maximum output. Let's use China as a case study, it has been recorded that the government bodies has yielded better results than private bodies in the last decade with respect to scientific research.
In conclusion, scientific works handled by the government are usually of higher standards and are usually properly funded to give the best results, while privately owned company may want to manage funds to execute scientific research which may lead to inaccuracies.
The
Government
should manage and execute
scientific
findings
instead
of
privately
owned
organisations
. It is
agreed
that the
government
should take charge of
scientific
research
. This essay will
first
discuss the financial benefits accessible by the
government
and the quality of
scientific
research
when handled by the
government
.
Firstly
, the
government
is in charge of the monetary policy and would have adequate access to funds to carry out a
scientific
project. It is an established truth that
scientific
projects are costly and would need a
financially
capable
body
to handle it, the
government
being the
body
that controls the flow of funds would have
little
or no issue funding
scientific
works as compared to a private
organisation
with limited funds.
For example
, when the Ebola virus broke out, W. H. O which is a
government
body
had deployed scientist in Africa to curb the illness caused by the virus.
Secondly
,
scientific
findings handled by the
government
are
usually
of high standards and have
good
quality.
Because
of the large network the
government
possesses, when carrying out
research
they are accessible to experts from other countries in that field. The
Government
is aware they are answerable to the
people
and having a reputation to protect are
also
expected
to give maximum output.
Let
's
use
China as a case study, it has
been recorded
that the
government
bodies
has yielded better results than private
bodies
in the last decade with respect to
scientific
research.
In conclusion
,
scientific
works handled by the
government
are
usually
of higher standards and are
usually
properly
funded to give the best results, while
privately
owned
company
may want to manage funds to execute
scientific
research
which may lead to inaccuracies.