Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

science could help people live up to 100 or 200 years even would that be a good or bad development Discuss both views and give your opinion v.2

science could help people live up to 100 or 200 years even would that be a good or bad development 2
Science has brought a gigantic revolution in the field of medical. presently, science is likely to make it possible to live for a century or more with the emergence of surgical, cardiac operations and prodigious remedies. Undeniably, it has several benefits, however its darker side can not be underestimated. Here, I would like to account for both sides with my perception. There are multifarious pros of this phenomenon. First and foremost, living a long life can play a phenomenal role in the overall development of a nation. For example, work force especially excellent doctors, teachers, engineers, sportsman and business man will serve their nations for a large span of life. As a result, a country can thrive by leaps and bounds. Moreover, living long life is lucrative for everyone to relish with their kith and kins. For instance, one can enjoy festive occasions, personal achievements, wearing, eating and travelling for maximum period through out his life. Consequently, it will lend an immense pleasure to mankind. By contrast, it has darker side too. Firstly, this trend is expected to be responsible for an astronomical menace called ' population explosion' . To illustrate, the number of people will gian ground radically as the death rates will decline remarkably. Thus, the world may have to face scarcity of food, shelter, jobs and clothes in this era of inflation. Hence, it could be devastating for human beings. Furthermore, a massive number of people will be destructive for environment. As they will promote deforestation, excessive consumerism of goods and natural resources. From my notion, although living for longer period will be a boon for masses, however it is anticipated to be bane as well. A proper family planing, educating people at larger extent, imposing restriction over striding population could be productive to make a perfect balance between health and wealth. To recapitulate, it is need of hour to take some proactive steps to prevent people from cons of this blessing to live for 100 years by both government and individuals as it is said that ' ' prevention is better than cure' ' .
Science has brought a gigantic revolution in the field of medical.
presently
, science is likely to
make
it possible to
live
for a century or more with the emergence of surgical, cardiac operations and prodigious remedies.
Undeniably
, it has several benefits,
however
its darker side can not
be underestimated
. Here, I would like to account for both sides with my perception.

There are multifarious pros of this phenomenon.
First
and foremost, living a long
life
can play a phenomenal role in the
overall
development of a nation.
For example
, work force
especially
excellent doctors, teachers, engineers, sportsman and business
man
will serve their nations for a large span of
life
.
As a result
, a country can thrive by leaps and bounds.
Moreover
, living long
life
is lucrative for everyone to relish with their kith and
kins
.
For instance
, one can enjoy festive occasions, personal achievements, wearing, eating and travelling for maximum period
through out
his
life
.
Consequently
, it will lend an immense pleasure to mankind.

By contrast, it has darker side too.
Firstly
, this trend is
expected
to be responsible for an astronomical menace called ' population
explosion&
#039;
.
To illustrate, the number of
people
will
gian
ground
radically
as the death rates will decline
remarkably
.
Thus
, the world may
have to
face scarcity of food, shelter, jobs and clothes in this era of inflation.
Hence
, it could be devastating for human beings.
Furthermore
, a massive number of
people
will be destructive for environment. As they will promote deforestation, excessive consumerism of
goods
and natural resources.

From my notion, although living for longer period will be a boon for masses,
however
it
is anticipated
to be bane
as well
. A proper family planing, educating
people
at larger extent, imposing restriction over striding population could be productive to
make
a perfect balance between health and wealth.

To recapitulate, it
is need
of hour to take
some
proactive steps to
prevent
people
from cons of this blessing to
live
for 100 years by both
government
and individuals as it
is said
that ' ' prevention is better than
cure&
#039; '
.
15Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8Mistakes

IELTS essay science could help people live up to 100 or 200 years even would that be a good or bad development 2

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
349 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts