Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Science could help people live up to 100 or 200 years. Would it be a good or bad development? Discuss both views and give your opinion. v.1

Science could help people live up to 100 or 200 years. Would it be a good or bad development? v. 1
The hard work of scientist's and researcher's could support us to breathe almost two centuries more. The pith of my idea is that, it would be a positive growth because these inventions assists us with an advanced medicine to stay healthier and the latest technology to enjoy life at sky heights. On the brighter side, Innovations encouraged any nation to grow stronger and help in economical growth with latest technology equipments. It provides people of community and other nations with more job opportunities and reduce unemployment. Moreover, it also helps them in health as well as the education sector by providing new treatments to cure diseases and up to date teaching methods to reduce the illiteracy level up to zero percent. To exemplify it, the Cuba is a small country, where uneducated persons are less than 1% and mostly youngsters are in medical sector due to many advanced techniques. On the down side, the Science measurements and innovations required number of natural resources and some time, it harms our environment and natural habitat because many species are extinct due to science research's, which affects our food chain and eco - system. In my perspective, the scientists should use bio - degradable resources to invent any new thing as well as to avoid taking samples of animals and secure natural habitat. In such manner, comfort of scientific research's in eco - friendly way will be more fruitful due to zero environmental risk. To recapitulate it all, its truth, scientific methods assist us to live more as well as it is grateful achievement, but it is only beneficial if researcher's finding will be eco -friendly.
The
hard
work of scientist's and researcher's could support us to breathe almost two centuries more. The pith of my
idea
is that, it would be a
positive
growth
because
these inventions assists us with an advanced medicine to stay healthier and the latest technology to enjoy life at sky heights.

On the brighter side, Innovations encouraged any nation to grow stronger and
help
in
economical
growth with
latest
technology equipments. It provides
people
of community and other nations with more job opportunities and
reduce
unemployment.
Moreover
, it
also
helps
them in health
as well
as the education sector by providing new treatments to cure diseases and up to date teaching methods to
reduce
the illiteracy level up to zero percent. To exemplify it, the Cuba is a
small
country, where uneducated persons are less than 1% and
mostly
youngsters are in medical sector due to
many
advanced techniques.

On the
down side
, the Science measurements and innovations required number of natural resources and
some
time, it harms our environment and natural habitat
because
many
species are extinct due to science research's, which affects our food chain and
eco
-
system.

In my perspective, the scientists should
use
bio
-
degradable resources to invent any new thing
as well
as to avoid taking samples of animals and secure natural habitat. In such manner, comfort of scientific research's in
eco
-
friendly way will be more fruitful due to zero environmental
risk
.

To recapitulate it all, its truth, scientific methods assist us to
live
more
as
well as it is grateful achievement,
but
it is
only
beneficial if researcher's finding will be
eco -friendly
.
5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
0Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
10Mistakes

IELTS essay Science could help people live up to 100 or 200 years. Would it be a good or bad development? v. 1

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
273 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 5.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts