Science could help people live up to 100 or 200 years. Would it be a good or bad development? Discuss both views and give your opinion. v.2
Science could help people live up to 100 or 200 years. Would it be a good or bad development? v. 2
average life expectancy is reducing by day. However, it is believed that application of science knowledge, such as DNA modification, could prolong lives. I am of the opinion that living longer will be dangerous; except good health is ensured.
To start with, increasing human existence to two centuries has lots of benefits. Firstly, people can have enough time to achieve their aims and goals. As it is now, most people feel that life is too short, so if they have the opportunities of more years alive, they will be able to fulfill their dreams. For instance, one could have up to ten different doctorate degrees as they wish, if they live long enough. In addition, having more time will ensure people can enjoy their life achievements. it is not uncommon for workers to die immediately after their retirement, which means that enjoying their benefits for s not possible. this will not be an issue if they have over 100 years to live.
Conversely, doubling life expectancy could also be a negative development. because of the challenges of life, some people, who have had really difficult circumstances, will want it all to end at an average time. Evidently, economic recession has raised suicide rates in Nigeria. this means that living for more decades will only extend their suffering. also, with old age comes several health problems, which include hypertension and diabetes. so extending lives will increase risks of such diseases.
Concluding, although science could help add more years to people' s lives in order to have more time to meet up with their plans, and enjoy what they have acquired; I believe it will be a dangerous trend because it can mean more suffering for people with bad situations, as well as increase risks for illnesses associated with old age.
average
life
expectancy is reducing by day.
However
, it
is believed
that application of science knowledge, such as DNA modification, could prolong
lives
. I am of the opinion that living longer will be
dangerous
; except
good
health
is ensured
.
To
start
with, increasing human existence to two centuries has lots of benefits.
Firstly
,
people
can have
enough
time
to achieve their aims and goals. As it is
now
, most
people
feel that
life
is too short,
so
if they have the opportunities of more years alive, they will be able to fulfill their dreams.
For instance
, one could have up to ten
different
doctorate degrees as they wish, if they
live
long
enough
.
In addition
, having more
time
will ensure
people
can enjoy their
life
achievements.
it
is not uncommon for workers to
die
immediately after their retirement, which means that enjoying their benefits for s not possible.
this
will not be an issue if they have over 100 years to
live
.
Conversely
, doubling
life
expectancy could
also
be a
negative
development.
because
of the challenges of
life
,
some
people
, who have had
really
difficult circumstances, will want it all to
end
at an average
time
.
Evidently
, economic recession has raised suicide rates in Nigeria.
this
means that living for more decades will
only
extend their suffering.
also
, with
old
age
comes
several health problems, which include hypertension and diabetes.
so
extending
lives
will increase
risks
of such diseases.
Concluding, although science could
help
add
more years to
people&
#039; s
lives
in order to have more
time
to
meet
up with their plans, and enjoy what they have acquired; I believe it will be a
dangerous
trend
because
it can mean more suffering for
people
with
bad
situations,
as well
as increase
risks
for illnesses associated with
old
age.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
19Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8Mistakes