Nowadays most people are undoubtedly more aware of the importance a healthy lifestyle can have in avoiding disease and consequently in prolonging their lifespan. Nevertheless, some question whether public money should be used as a way of promoting healthy lifestyle so that the likelihood that the population might get ill to significantly decrease, or the sums of money should be allocated for people who are currently afflicted by disease.
On the one hand, especially the people living in remote or poor places, but also in other areas, can be prone to disease, which could be contagious. Furthermore, the majority of them do not generally have knowledge regarding how to maintain themselves healthy. It is fundamental for people not to neglect any symptom, even though they do not deem it severe and they expect it to get away soon. Consulting a doctor and taking the medicine he recommends is likely to help one feel better in a few days. The population also has to know that an adequate nutrition and a sporting life strengthen the organism.
On the other hand, life takes precedence over money, therefore it is people' s duty to take care of their kin in times of need. Scientists have continuously conducted research into medicine since a long time ago. Consequenty, numerous methods of treating and combating disease have been discovered. Taking into account that technology has led to the creation and development of advanced medical equipment, medicine has never been in a better position asit is today, to allow doctors to save many lives.
To conclude although I believe that it is important to invest public money in endorsing healthy lifestyle, it would be unhuman and unfair not to treat the patients who were unfortunate and got ill. The budged should first and foremost ensure proper conditions and remedies for those who already suffer from disease.
Nowadays most
people
are
undoubtedly
more aware of the importance a
healthy
lifestyle can have in avoiding
disease
and
consequently
in prolonging their lifespan.
Nevertheless
,
some
question whether public
money
should be
used
as a way of promoting
healthy
lifestyle
so
that the likelihood that the population might
get
ill to
significantly
decrease, or the sums of
money
should
be allocated
for
people
who are
currently
afflicted by disease.
On the one hand,
especially
the
people
living in remote or poor places,
but
also
in other areas, can be prone to
disease
, which could be contagious.
Furthermore
, the majority of them do not
generally
have knowledge regarding how to maintain themselves
healthy
. It is fundamental for
people
not to neglect any symptom,
even though
they do not deem it
severe and
they
expect
it to
get
away
soon
. Consulting a doctor and taking the medicine he recommends is likely to
help
one feel better in a few days. The population
also
has to
know that an adequate nutrition and a sporting life strengthen the organism.
On the other hand
, life takes precedence over
money
,
therefore
it is
people&
#039; s duty to take care of their kin in times of need. Scientists have
continuously
conducted research into medicine since a long time ago.
Consequenty
, numerous methods of treating and combating
disease
have
been discovered
. Taking into account that technology has led to the creation and development of advanced medical equipment, medicine has never been in a better position
asit
is
today
, to
allow
doctors to save
many
lives
.
To conclude
although I believe that it is
important
to invest public
money
in endorsing
healthy
lifestyle, it would be
unhuman
and unfair not to treat the patients who were unfortunate and
got
ill. The budged should
first
and foremost ensure proper conditions and remedies for those who already suffer from
disease
.