Nowadays teaching the traditional subjects have become controversial debate where everyone have their own valid points. Some people claim that these conventional subjects are inadequate for learning while others believe that these are imperative for future. In my view, i completely disagree with the subjects for school curriculum because at some stage of life, every subjects play significant role and a person can develop better insight.
On one hand, the subjects for instance calculus, derivatives do not helps a student to face world's reality. In other words, theoretical learning is not only sufficient to overcome the life's problem. Furthermore, subjects which demand our existence like physical education, arts and crafts are of them which have improved the vision for future. Consequently, theoretical learning have degraded the quality of education system by forcing them to study, for which they have no interests. Like if a person wants to become wrestler, then maths and science have no role in it.
On other hand, these conventional subjects have their own essence and significance. It has been in the syllabus since ancient time because it entitled everything of world. Instead of focus only in one field, it's good to have understanding of other fields. Moreover, these subjects will develope better understanding which prepare students to face any situations in their life. They can also understand others perspective easily like social skills. For example, to being doctor, their subjective knowledge is mandatory as well as he should also being awared from others field to cure patients.
In conclusion, traditional subjects have their own charisma of culture, city and world and even comprise the information of universe which actually have improved young person's mentally capacity and give them exposure rather than to focus only one field.
Nowadays teaching the traditional
subjects
have become controversial debate where everyone
have
their
own
valid points.
Some
people
claim that these conventional
subjects
are inadequate for learning while others believe that these are imperative for future. In my view,
i
completely disagree with the
subjects
for school curriculum
because
at
some
stage of life, every
subjects
play significant role and a person can develop better insight.
On one hand, the
subjects
for instance
calculus, derivatives do not
helps
a student to face world's reality. In
other
words, theoretical learning is not
only
sufficient to overcome the life's problem.
Furthermore
,
subjects
which demand our existence like physical education, arts and crafts are of them which have
improved
the vision for future.
Consequently
, theoretical learning
have
degraded the quality of education system by forcing them to study, for which they have no interests. Like if a person wants to become wrestler, then
maths
and science have no role in it.
On
other
hand, these conventional
subjects
have their
own
essence and significance. It has been in the syllabus since ancient time
because
it entitled everything of world.
Instead
of focus
only
in one
field
, it's
good
to have understanding of
other
fields
.
Moreover
, these
subjects
will
develope
better understanding which prepare students to face any situations in their life. They can
also
understand others perspective
easily
like social
skills
.
For example
, to being doctor, their subjective knowledge is mandatory
as well
as he should
also
being
awared
from others
field
to cure patients.
In conclusion
, traditional
subjects
have their
own
charisma of culture, city and world and even comprise the information of universe which actually have
improved
young person's mentally capacity and give them exposure
rather
than to focus
only
one
field
.