It is undeniable that human activity directly or indirectly increases environmental damage. However, a plethora of people contents that government should handle the environmental damage and others disagree with the statement. Not surprisingly, the number of controversies over this issue is overwhelmed. Among this controversy, personally I believed that individuals should oversee the problem. I feel this way for several reasons I will expound subsequent followings.
To commence with, if people aware of their activity then damage can be reduced. They can easily protect their vicinity from being pollution and some volunteer work might be reduced the damage. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I was in high school, I lived in a village where many loam factory located. Thus, the owner of the factory used the water of the river for washing the fabric but did not dump the waste properly. Therefore, most of the pond was polluted by the colour of the process water. So, one day I and some of my school friends protested against this activity and started to clean the place and other village members also joined. Thus, an individual' s awareness can also reduce global damage.
Furthermore, if individual people constrain their daily activity then damage can also be declined. For example, in the city of the Dhaka, most of the people are not aware of their activity. They are throwing waste, plastic containers here and there. As a result, they are blocking the drainage system and the city is flooded with a little rain. Moreover, plastic damaging the fertility of the soil and declining the growth of the crops. Besides, the rapid expansion of industry, transportation polluted the city by releasing the smoke and sound. But, if individual people are aware of this issue they can easily reduce this environmental damage.
To recapitulate, I am on the opinion that if an individual should be concerned about the damage then global damage can easily be brought in a limit.
It is undeniable that human
activity
directly
or
indirectly
increases environmental
damage
.
However
, a plethora of
people
contents that
government
should handle the environmental
damage
and others
disagree with the statement. Not
surprisingly
, the number of controversies over this issue
is overwhelmed
. Among this controversy,
personally
I believed that
individuals
should oversee the problem. I feel this way for several reasons I will expound subsequent followings.
To commence with, if
people
aware of their
activity
then
damage
can be
reduced
. They can
easily
protect their vicinity from being pollution and
some
volunteer work might be
reduced
the
damage
. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I was in high school, I
lived
in a village where
many loam
factory located.
Thus
, the owner of the factory
used
the water of the river for washing the fabric
but
did not dump the waste
properly
.
Therefore
, most of the pond
was polluted
by the
colour
of the process water.
So
, one day I and
some
of my school friends protested against this
activity
and
started
to clean the place and other village members
also
joined
.
Thus
, an
individual&
#039; s awareness can
also
reduce
global damage.
Furthermore
, if
individual
people
constrain their daily
activity
then
damage
can
also
be declined
.
For example
, in the city of the Dhaka, most of the
people
are not aware of their
activity
. They are throwing waste, plastic containers here and there.
As a result
, they are blocking the drainage system and the city
is flooded
with a
little
rain.
Moreover
, plastic damaging the fertility of the soil and declining the growth of the crops.
Besides
, the rapid expansion of industry, transportation polluted the city by releasing the smoke and sound.
But
, if
individual
people
are aware of this issue they can
easily
reduce
this environmental damage.
To recapitulate, I am on the opinion that if an
individual
should
be concerned
about the
damage
then global
damage
can
easily
be brought
in a limit.