There is a debate concerning about the proper work, whether undertaking in the same enterprise for the lifetime or occupying distinct organisations. This essay discusses both sides of this contentious argument and then I will give my own perspectives.
If someone is determined to labour in one place, it would ensure their long career and the easiness reaching better position one day. The company certainly pays attention to the loyal employees and the ones whose understanding their works better anyone else, knowing how to develop their business and/or products, and strengthening the weakness of their organisation. All of these are only obtained by diving the duties for a long time and then someone would become an expert on this kind of job. This expertises lead to a higher position, albeit perhaps in long way to go. Unfortunately, this condition might bring a person in lacking experiences from another abilities and situations that would be a challenge for him or her if their office have got a bankrupt suddenly.
On another side, the research shows that people who are changing their occupation twice in a minimum can take a multitasking job and survive in facing some unexpected issues rather than those who only have one position in their life. For instance, an actuary has a job in a private company taking care of life insurance before she moved into a government institution that tackle some medical and health issues in which threaten lives. She should hand on experiences regarding all the calculation about the risk-life theories in real life, whereby it can be only acquired from the company which she undertook beforehand. However, the drawback of displacing the organisations over and over again is the workers should start their career from zero in their new institution and might achieve to a perfect designation that is not in the short time.
To conclude, both of the constant or altered organisations will give each own beneficial and detrimental conditions. In my opinion, it is a good idea and recommended to take chances looking perfect organisations, thereby if it have fitted into what is looking for, I prefer to immediately decide to settle down for a long time until the time of retired. 
There is a debate concerning about the proper work, whether undertaking in the same enterprise for the lifetime or occupying distinct  
organisations
. This essay discusses both sides of this contentious argument and then I will give my  
own
 perspectives.
If someone  
is determined
 to  
labour
 in one place, it would ensure their  
long
 career and the easiness reaching better position one day. The  
company
  certainly
 pays attention to the loyal employees and the ones whose understanding their works better anyone else, knowing how to develop their business and/or products, and strengthening the weakness of their  
organisation
. All of these are  
only
 obtained by diving the duties for a  
long
 time and then someone would become an expert on this kind of job.  
This
 expertises lead to a higher position, albeit perhaps in  
long
 way to go. Unfortunately, this condition might bring a person in lacking experiences from another abilities and situations that would be a challenge for him or her if their office have  
got
 a bankrupt  
suddenly
.
On another side, the research  
shows
 that  
people
 who are changing their occupation twice in a minimum can take a multitasking job and survive in facing  
some
 unexpected issues  
rather
 than those who  
only
 have one position in their life.  
For instance
, an actuary has a job in a private  
company
 taking care of life insurance  
before
 she  
moved
 into a  
government
 institution that tackle  
some
 medical and health issues in which threaten  
lives
. She should hand on experiences regarding all the calculation about the  
risk
-life theories in real life, whereby it can be  
only
 acquired from the  
company
 which she undertook beforehand.  
However
, the drawback of displacing the  
organisations
 over and over again is the workers should  
start
 their career from zero in their new institution and might achieve to a perfect designation  
that is
 not in the short time. 
To conclude
, both of the constant or altered  
organisations
 will give each  
own
 beneficial and detrimental conditions. In my opinion, it is a  
good
  idea
 and  
recommended to take
 chances looking perfect  
organisations
, thereby if it  
have
 fitted into what is looking for, I prefer to immediately decide to settle down for a  
long
 time until the time of retired.