While retirement is a sensitive issue, having the same age limit for all professionals could create some ripples. For all types of occupations, people tend to work a minimum of 30-40 years and it's highly likely for them to retire post that period. While some people think that early retirement can be favourable for them and they should retire before the set 65 years of tenure, on the other hand, the majority of the professionals believe that they should be working minimum till 60-65 to avail the benefits and retire, this essay would be covering some of the major reasons for different retirement age.
To begin with, the age limit 65 could be a lot for some people with an occupation which involves more physical activities or involves manual work, for example Miners, Construction workers, and etc. Also, retiring at an age of 65 will be a big deal for them as it might exhaust them due to their natural age. Moreover, I think the government should be able to have some fatigue for these people and form different policies to make sure that they can be retired early may be by their 50's or before that so that this can benefit them, rather than imposing a policy on the basis of age.
However, occupations related IT, Science or research can still be persuaded without involving or exceeding ones physical activity. My neighbour is a construction administrator which requires whole lot of the body than the brain, he has to visit all the sites. For instance, he has to monitor all the buildings sometimes even climb hundreds of stairs to reach a floor to run his safety checklist which is not possible for him to do at 55 years.
In conclusion, I agree with the people who think that we should have retirement age set on the kind of service we do rather on the basis of age. Also, I have come across a lot of people, where they are extending their work days just so that they can hit retirement and are not able to meet the productivity they wish to achieve.
While
retirement
is a sensitive issue, having the same
age
limit for all professionals could create
some
ripples. For all types of occupations,
people
tend to work a minimum of 30-40 years and it's
highly
likely for them to retire post that period. While
some
people
think
that early
retirement
can be
favourable
for
them and
they should retire
before
the set 65 years of tenure,
on the other hand
, the majority of the professionals believe that they should be working minimum till 60-65 to avail the benefits and retire, this essay would be covering
some of the
major reasons for
different
retirement
age.
To
begin
with, the
age
limit 65 could be a lot for
some
people
with an occupation which involves more physical activities or involves manual work,
for example
Miners, Construction workers,
and etc
.
Also
, retiring at an
age
of 65 will be a
big
deal for them as it might exhaust them due to their natural
age
.
Moreover
, I
think
the
government
should be able to have
some
fatigue for these
people
and form
different
policies to
make
sure that they can
be retired
early may be by their
50's
or
before
that
so
that this can benefit them,
rather
than imposing a policy on the basis of age.
However
, occupations related IT, Science or research can
still
be persuaded
without involving or exceeding ones physical activity. My
neighbour
is a construction administrator which requires
whole lot
of the body than the brain, he
has to
visit all the sites.
For instance
, he
has to
monitor all the buildings
sometimes
even climb hundreds of stairs to reach a floor to run his safety checklist which is not possible for him to do at 55 years.
In conclusion
, I
agree
with the
people
who
think
that we should have
retirement
age
set on the kind of service we do
rather
on the basis of
age
.
Also
, I have
come
across
a lot of
people
, where they are extending their work days
just
so
that they can hit
retirement
and are not able to
meet
the productivity they wish to achieve.