The methods of mitigating traffic congestion have been a heated topic of controversy. Some people argue that the construction of larger roads is the answer for the problem. However, I contend that such a solution is ineffective in the long term, while the opinion to construct railways and subways is a far better measure.
There is a common fallacy that governmental spending on building larger roads could address the problem of traffic congestion. An increase in road size could reduce the traffic intensity in the short term, but larger roads also mean that the citizens are barely encouraged to purchase more individuals' vehicles. This leads to the fact that the larger roads would soon be filled with intense traffic again. For instance, traffic jams still exist in several cities, even after they expanded the roads last year. In brief, if this was the accurate solution, traffic jams would not still persist in the long run.
Rail and subways, however, could ensure that traffic congestion is properly addressed. Unlike cars and buses, trains are capable of transporting thousands of people simultaneously at a time and thus would meet the transport demand of a vast number of passengers. Moreover, trains do not have to go through the intersections and traffic lights and dedicated lines ensure their travel is being hardly interrupted. In other words, trains are always on time, regardless of the level of traffic. This level of punctuality would encourage many to choose railways and subways as their primary means of transport, and the number of individual vehicles decreases accordingly. As a result, traffic congestion could be tackled successfully.
As to conclude, the above facts evidently elaborate that, building more and larger roads is an unsustainable measure, while train and subways would be a much more effective solution for the problem of traffic congestion.
The methods of mitigating
traffic
congestion
have been a heated topic of controversy.
Some
people
argue that the construction of larger
roads
is the answer for the problem.
However
, I contend that such a solution is ineffective in the long term, while the opinion to construct railways and
subways
is a far better measure.
There is a common fallacy that governmental spending on building larger
roads
could address the problem of
traffic
congestion
. An increase in
road
size could
reduce
the
traffic
intensity in the short term,
but
larger
roads
also
mean that the citizens are
barely
encouraged to
purchase
more individuals' vehicles. This leads to the fact that the larger
roads
would
soon
be filled
with intense
traffic
again.
For instance
,
traffic
jams
still
exist in several cities, even after they expanded the
roads
last year.
In brief
, if this was the accurate solution,
traffic
jams would not
still
persist in the long run.
Rail and
subways
,
however
, could ensure that
traffic
congestion
is
properly
addressed. Unlike cars and buses,
trains
are capable of transporting thousands of
people
simultaneously
at a time and
thus
would
meet
the transport demand of a vast number of passengers.
Moreover
,
trains
do not
have to
go through the intersections and
traffic
lights and dedicated lines ensure their travel
is being hardly
interrupted.
In other words
,
trains
are always on time, regardless of the level of
traffic
. This level of punctuality would encourage
many
to choose railways and
subways
as their primary means of transport, and the number of individual vehicles decreases
accordingly
.
As a result
,
traffic
congestion
could
be tackled
successfully
.
As
to conclude
, the above facts
evidently
elaborate that, building more and larger
roads
is an unsustainable measure, while
train
and
subways
would be a much more effective solution for the problem of
traffic
congestion
.