There are those who argue friends should have similar points of view for their friendship to success, while others support that having different opinions can be beneficial to these people. This essay will discuss both sides of this argument and I will provide my own perspective on this matter.
To begin with, people usually prefer to spend time together with those who have the same tastes and opinions as them. By sharing equal views, they increase the likelihood of stricking a new relationship and therefore reduce the probability of conflict. For example, those within the same political spectrum are more likely to support each other’s ideas, which might be helpful in times of strong division, such as elections. Otherwise, if friends do not share a reasonable set of equal interests and opinions, their friendship might not get enough traction to continue to be developed.
However, in most scenarios, it is possible for a friendship to nourish due to unequal ways of thinking, especially in professional environments. Differences can be quite helpful in debates and discussions, since they allow the speakers to evolve ideas and elaborate about opposing arguments. For instance, successful brainstorming sections usually rely on a myriad of views to establish a final set of feasible solutions. As a result, the potencial advantages brought by different opinions can stimulate people to come closer to each other, even outside of the workplace, since it brings clear benefits.
In conclusion, I believe both sides have merits. On balance, even though differences can spark unpleasant discussions, I strongly support that most people can take advantage of having friends with opposing opinions, since this allows for more complex discussions, which might lead to positive outcomes.
There are those who argue friends should have similar points of view for their friendship to success, while others support that having
different
opinions
can be beneficial to these
people
. This essay will discuss both sides of this argument and I will provide my
own
perspective on this matter.
To
begin
with,
people
usually
prefer to spend time together with those who have the same tastes and
opinions
as them. By sharing equal views, they increase the likelihood of
stricking
a new relationship and
therefore
reduce
the probability of conflict.
For example
, those within the same political spectrum are more likely to support each other’s
ideas
, which might be helpful in times of strong division, such as elections.
Otherwise
, if friends do not share a reasonable set of equal interests and
opinions
, their friendship might not
get
enough
traction to continue to
be developed
.
However
, in most scenarios, it is possible for a friendship to nourish due to unequal ways of thinking,
especially
in professional environments. Differences can be quite helpful in debates and discussions, since they
allow
the speakers to evolve
ideas
and elaborate about opposing arguments.
For instance
, successful brainstorming sections
usually
rely on a myriad of views to establish a final set of feasible solutions.
As a result
, the
potencial
advantages brought by
different
opinions
can stimulate
people
to
come
closer to each other, even
outside of
the workplace, since it brings
clear
benefits.
In conclusion
, I believe both sides have merits. On balance,
even though
differences can spark unpleasant discussions, I
strongly
support that most
people
can take advantage of having friends with opposing
opinions
, since this
allows
for more complex discussions, which might lead to
positive
outcomes.