Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Politician private lives should not be published in newspapers. To what extend do you agree or disagree. v.1

Politician private lives should not be published in newspapers. v. 1
In today's society, a politician is as much a public figure as most Hollywood actors or actresses. However, this is not a valid reason to expose a person's private life in mass media. Therefore, I strongly agree with this idea. There has always been an unspoken rule within journalism, which draws the lines between ethical and unethical practices of a reporter. Moreover, The popularity of such conduct has been on the rise since social media has been made a part of our everyday life. As a result, the level of intimacy has been blurred between our close friends and an internet personality – people no longer feel ashamed to pry into others' affairs even if it is unwanted. Thus, in this day and age, any story that peels back the curtain on a public figure is consumed feverishly by the public. Reporters have felt pressured to compete with ever-increasing amount of information which bombards the average person on a daily basis. According to reports, there is a considerable drop in the limit of a reader's attention span in recent years. Nowadays, shock headlines are a marketing strategy that has become more a necessity. Publishing companies are looking for a way to grab readers attention quickly, by sacrificing the sanctity of journalism. This is simply corporate greed; exploiting a human being for the sake of profits. Such actions are unpardonable and shameful. In summary, there are few reasons to justify publishing private matters of a government official in the media. Most printing businesses are seeking to secure a quick turnover by using outrage and shock. Even when it comes at the expense of someone's misery. Consequently, I am in agreement with reserving a politician's privacy.
In
today
's society, a politician is as much a public figure as most Hollywood actors or actresses.
However
, this is not a valid reason to expose a person's private life in mass media.
Therefore
, I
strongly
agree
with this
idea
.

There has always been an unspoken
rule
within journalism, which draws the lines between ethical and unethical practices of a reporter.
Moreover
, The popularity of such conduct has been on the rise since social media has
been made
a part of our everyday life.
As a result
, the level of intimacy has
been blurred
between our close friends and an internet personality
people
no longer feel ashamed to pry into others' affairs even if it
is unwanted
.
Thus
, in this day and age, any story that peels back the curtain on a public figure
is consumed
feverishly
by the public.

Reporters have felt pressured to compete with ever-increasing amount of information which bombards the average person on a daily basis. According to reports, there is a considerable drop in the limit of a reader's attention span in recent years. Nowadays, shock headlines are a marketing strategy that has become more a necessity. Publishing
companies
are looking for a way to grab
readers
attention
quickly
, by sacrificing the sanctity of journalism. This is
simply
corporate greed; exploiting a human being for the sake of profits. Such actions are unpardonable and shameful.

In summary, there are few reasons to justify publishing private matters of a
government
official in the media. Most printing businesses are seeking to secure a quick turnover by using outrage and shock.
Even when
it
comes
at the expense of someone's misery.
Consequently
, I am in agreement with reserving a politician's privacy.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8Mistakes

IELTS essay Politician private lives should not be published in newspapers. v. 1

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
284 words
8
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 8.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 8.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 8.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 8.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts
  • 6band
    Politicians’ private lives should not be published in newspapers. v. 1
    Some would argue that the personal lives of elected officials must not be revealed on print media. This essay completely agrees with the statement because privacy is the fundamental right of a citizen and propaganda in newspapers would destroy their political career. Besides, being the political re...
  • 6band
    Politicians private lives should not be published in newspapers, v. 1
    Presently, the number of species under extinction threat is increasing. So, to maintain biodiversity, one must understand the role of each and every species on Earth. To point that in every ecosystem there are 'keystone' species that sustains a whole bunch of other animals and plants. Destroying one...
  • 6.5band
    Politicians’ private lives should not be published in newspapers. v. 2
    Some believe that personal information about what politicians do when they are not working should not be the content of newspaper articles. This essay disagrees with this as the public should know if their officials are doing anything illegal and this subject is only written about in exceptional cir...
  • 6.5band
    Politician's private lives should not be published in newspapers. v. 3
    With the advancement in technology, anyone's private life can be published in a newspaper. I agree that politician’s lives should not be published in newspapers or any other medium no matter what the story is. In the following paragraphs, I will discuss both scenarios on this serious issue. Politic...